My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-06-10-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2010
>
01-06-10-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2015 9:18:25 AM
Creation date
1/5/2010 1:26:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
than other lots in the area, make siting a conforming new home extremely difficult. If all setback <br />requirements were met the home and garage would need to be constructed within a 49 foot wide <br />by 40 foot deep area. The existing home currently encroaches within both side setbacks. It <br />might be possible for the applicants to construct a home within the front and lakeshore setbacks; <br />though it could be as tall as 35 feet. <br />The prevailing character of the neighborhood is of one and a half to two-story homes constructed <br />in the 1950's. However, two homes have more recently been redeveloped, and given the high <br />value of the land it is likely that the City will see similar variance requests in this neighborhood. <br />Additionally, given that one of the homes is located as near as 66 feet from the OHW level, as <br />homes redevelop it is likely that they will be constructed nearer to the lake then they currently <br />exist. A recommendation for approval or denial will need to be accompanied by a finding on <br />whether the proposed home would alter the essential character of the community. <br />If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance, Staff recommends the <br />following four conditions: <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br />the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br />the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. <br />2. Building, Grading and Erosion Control, and Demolition permits shall be obtained by <br />the property owner. <br />3. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. <br />4. The applicant shall obtain approval or a waiver from the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District prior to the issuance of any building permits. <br />Options <br />The findings in this report are not specific enough to fully support approval or denial of the <br />variance. With a motion to approve or deny, the findings or the reasons for the motion must be <br />stated. The following three criteria must be addressed: <br />® The proposed home will/will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or the <br />City because... <br />Once the findings are stated, a full motion to approve or deny can be made. If there is a motion <br />to table, it is not necessary to state the findings. <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case <br />09-022 for a variance at 1563 Edgewater Avenue based on the findings of fact and the <br />submitted plans, as amended by the four conditions in the January 6, 2010, planning case <br />report. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for Januar% 6, 2010 <br />hMetro-inet.uslardenhills lPlanninglPlanning Cases 2009109-022 1563 Edgeivater Avenue Variance (Pending)WI-06-10- PC Report Ranallo <br />Variance.doc <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.