My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7C, County Road E/T.H. 51 Bridge
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
01-11-10-R
>
7C, County Road E/T.H. 51 Bridge
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:52:38 AM
Creation date
1/11/2010 3:56:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
County Road E/T.H. 51 Bridge
General - Type
Municipal Agreement Update
Date
1/11/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />In 1993, approximately 1 S percent of the structural deck area was deteriorated. That area <br />of deterioration has likely increased since 1993, however it is very difficult to diagnose the <br />amount of deck repairs that are necessary until the current overlay is removed. Adding <br />these deck repairs to the proposed improvements, would increase the overall cost of the <br />proj ect around $100,000. Since the potential redeck of the bridge could trigger other <br />necessary repairs, the City could be liable for additional repair costs that are not included in <br />the municipal agreement funding. <br />Mn/DOT representatives present at the December 29, 2009 meeting stated that the City's <br />proposed improvements to the existing bridge would delay any upcoming bridge <br />improvement proj ects to an undetermined date in the future. <br />Discussion <br />Staff has identified the following options for the City Council's consideration about future <br />improvements to the County Road E bridge over T.H. 51. Staff is requesting action on <br />Option 1 only. <br />OPTION 1: Continue to pursue the Municipal Agreement by adjusting the scope of <br />the project in response to the comments provided by Mn/DOT. <br />PROS CONS <br />The proj ect could take place in 2010 (State FY When the improvements take place, if other <br />2011). deficiencies are identified, the City will be liable <br />for the additional costs. <br />The money awarded through this agreement <br />does not include approach sidewalks or an <br />attached sidewalk from Snelling Avenue. <br />The sidewalk will be a substandard design (5 <br />feet) and will not meet multi-use trail design <br />standards . <br />This is a temporary fix that will delay future <br />replacement of the bridge. <br />OPTION 2: Pursue the stand alone bridge option if the STP Federal Application is <br />successful. (Met Council will be meeting February 17, 2010 to determine which <br />proj ects will receive funding.) <br />PROS CONS <br />Could be constructed in 2012 (Federal FY 2013) The City must wait until 2012. <br />Meets all shared use pathway standards. Local costs- federal grants have a 20% local <br />match funding requirement <br />Will not affect future plans for bridge The City will be responsible for the maintenance <br />replacement. and upkeep of a stand-alone bridge. <br />Includes connecting path to Snelling Avenue. - <br />I IMet�o-inet. us l ardenhills IPR�PWIParks IMemos I Council Memos 1011110 Municipal Agreement Update. doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.