Laserfiche WebLink
Shoreland Regulations (Attachment B) <br /> Section 1330 has been included in its entirety. This section includes the most number of <br /> changes. The changes were included to reflect current DNR regulations, clarify current <br /> enforcement practice in the shoreland area, and to reflect growing concern amongst City Council <br /> and other residents about issues facing the shoreland. Revisions to the draft since the November <br /> 45 2009, meeting have been highlighted. <br /> Below is a list and summary of changes made to the Shoreland Regulation Section 1330. Staff <br /> also has prepared a handout with diagrams that summarizes the proposed changes (Attachment <br /> A). <br /> 1. Purpose—A purpose statement was added that clearly lists the goals of Section 1330. <br /> 2. Adjacent Lots— Staff is proposing an amendment to the regulation that addresses <br /> construction on lots when there are two adjacent developed lots that exceed the minimum <br /> setback to the lake (50 feet on Lake Johanna). The proposed regulation would require <br /> that new construction, and additions to existing homes, have a minimum setback that <br /> meets the average setback of the two adjacent lots minus ten feet. <br /> The existing regulations require new homes in this situation to meet the average setback - <br /> of the two adjacent properties; however, additions to homes need only meet the minimum <br /> setback to the lake. In essence this has created a"loophole"within the Code. The <br /> proposed amendment would remove the loophole that allows additions to be constructed <br /> up to the minimum setback line, thus reducing property rights that lakeshore lot owners <br /> currently enjoy. In order to inject some flexibility into the Code, Staff is proposing that <br /> all new construction, including additions, meet the average of the two adjacent homes, <br /> minus ten feet. A ten foot expansion would continue to protect sightlines for neighboring <br /> properties owners, but allow lakeshore lot owners some flexibility when improving their <br /> properties. Dwellings would still be required to meet the minimum lake setback. <br /> The fact that most properties around the City's lakes are nonconforming in some way <br /> makes improving lots difficult. Many lots are substandard and have homes that already <br /> encroach into the existing setback requirements. One of the questions that the City must <br /> grapple with is how to address the balance between maintaining the quality of housing <br /> stock and community character that Arden Hills' enjoys while still allowing people to <br /> continue to improve their homes. Staff feels that the proposed amendment allowing the <br /> "minus ten feet" flexibility provides a middle ground that maintains the site lines of <br /> homes on the lake while allowing existing lakeshore lot owners to improve their homes if <br /> they choose. <br /> 3. Exceptions to Structure Setbacks—The proposed regulations broaden and clarify what <br /> structures are permitted within the normal structure setback to the lake. Docks and <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010 <br /> IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases 12009109-003Shoreland Preservation Ordinance(Pending)102-16-10-Work Session-Memo <br /> -Shoreland Regulations.doc Page 3 of 5 <br />