Laserfiche WebLink
complicated because the tower has become a legal non-conforming use. A legal non-conforming <br />use means that the tower was originally constructed in conformance with the Zoning Code but, <br />over time, the Code changed and the tower is no longer in conformance with the Zoning Code. <br />The Reiling Tower is a legal non-conforming use because at some point after the tower was <br />approved in 1972, the City changed the Zoning Code to make antennas a conditional accessory <br />use in all zoning districts except for the B-3 District and heights were limited to 75 feet. This <br />change meant that new towers could only be built on sites with other uses and antennas could not <br />be placed at heights greater than 75 feet, except for on City water towers. Because the Reiling <br />Tower is the only use at 1296 County Road F and it is greater than 75 feet tall, it is a legal non- <br />conforming use. Allowing additional antennas would be an expansion of a non-conforming use. <br />A legal non-conforming use can only be expanded in one of two ways: <br />l. The applicant could request a variance, but would need to d�monstrate a hardship as <br />required under State Statutes; or, <br />2. The applicant could request a Zoning Code amendment to add provisions that allow <br />antennas to be added to existing, legally non-conforming towers at any height <br />provided the tower can structurally accommodate the antennas. <br />It would be quite difficult to prove a hardship in this type of case, which is why the applicant is <br />requesting a Zoning Code amendment. If the Zoning Code amendment is approved, the <br />applicant is then requesting a conditional use permit amendment to allow the additional antennas <br />and the relocation of antennas on the tower. <br />Discussion <br />There are two parts to the Zoning Code amendment request. The first part would allow antennas <br />at heights greater than 75 feet on existing antenna towers. The second part would allow <br />additional antennas to be located on existing antenna towers up to what would be structurally <br />feasible for the tower (Attachment C). If approved, the combined effect of the amendment <br />requests would allow additional antennas on legally, non-conforming antenna towers provided <br />the tower can structurally accommodate the antennas. <br />FCC Regulations <br />Whenever a city reviews its antenna ordinances, it is important to consider federal regulations. <br />All cities must take into account the provisions in the Federal Communications Act. Section <br />332(c)(7) of the Communications Act preserves state and local authority over zoning and land <br />use decisions for communications antennas; however, it includes limitations on that authority. <br />According to the regulations, a state or local government may not unreasonably discriminate <br />among providers of functionally equivalent services, may not regulate in a manner that prohibits <br />City ofA�den Hills <br />City Council Meeting fo� Feb�uary 22, 2010 <br />C: IDocuments and Settingslbecky.brazyslLocal Settingsl Temporczry Internet FilesIOLKISF102-22-10 - Regulnr Meeting - Memo - Reiling Tower <br />CUP Amen�.�oc <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />