01-25-10-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—January 25, 2010 9 7.B. Clarification on the 2010 Pavement Management Program Action (continued) Program, with a 24-foot street width for Valentine Avenue. This design does not meet Municipal State Aid (MSA) design requirements; therefore this project will not be eligible for MSA funds. - At the January 19 work session there was a question about final design for both a 24-foot and 26- foot design. Based on the direction of Council, Staff had proceeded with the 24-foot wide option and looking into reassigning another road to replace Valentine Avenue as a State Aid road. The City does have options to reassign the mileage from Valentine Avenue to other streets. Staff must provide a list of street segments, historical maintenance information and existing conditions to Mn/DOT State Aid for their review in order for them to confirm these street segments as potential MSA candidates. Staff is working on coordinating this with Mn/DOT. If the City would like final design completed for both 24-foot and 26-foot street widths along Valentine Avenue, this will result in additional design costs; the scope of the project included final design for one alternative only. WSB & Associates has provided a cost of $9,400 to complete an alternative design with a 26-foot street width. If any modifications are made to the street width, Staff is recommending the residents on Valentine Avenue be notified of these changes. Projects using State Aid funding must be submitted to State Aid for their review and the review turnaround typically ranges from two to four weeks but could take as long as six weeks. The 26-foot wide design is what would need to be reviewed by State Aid. If MSA funds are not used on this project, it is anticipated that the bidding schedule could be advanced to early March. Councilmember Holden noted for the record the Council received a petition from Valentine Crest Road against a major reconstruction and curb and gutter project on this road. Councilmember Grant stated he had requested this item be on the agenda because the Council may have inadvertently put the City into a position where they made a mistake based upon not having enough information about MSA. Staff had originally advocated a 26-foot wide road design to the Council. When the Council decided to go with a 24-foot road width they had asked about MSA and it was determined that the road would no longer qualify for MSA. What the Council did not know at that time were the details behind MSA, what other roads the City had that would qualify, and how much money the City would potentially loose. The Council had information that the residents wanted slower traffic. A narrower road would slow traffic somewhat but curbs would slow the traffic more. Another issue raised was the number of trees on the north side of Valentine Avenue that may need to be removed for a wider road. The Council needs to look into the MSA aspect deeper in order to determine that a narrower road is in fact the best for the City. Arden Hills needs 6.17 miles of roads designated as MSA in order to receive the full allotment of funds. Arden Hills is unique in that there are not many through streets that would qualify for MSA. He expressed concerns about making Valentine Avenue 24-foot wide and loosing MSA when the difference in making the road 26-foot wide is not that great, about $180 per unit on an $8,000 assessment. He also asked if the road could be moved over in order to save the trees on the north side of the road and make it 26-foot wide. Civil Engineer Giga stated Staff could look into this. The right-of-way along Valentine Avenue ranges from 66-70 feet and currently the street is centered on that right-of-way. Councilmember Grant asked if the road were moved two feet to the south if this would substantially change the cost structure.