Laserfiche WebLink
the lot shall not be redeveloped as a new use but may be <br />recombined with Lot 1. <br />Jamie Thelen, CEO Sand Companies, provided a presentation to the <br />Plannin Commission that included back round of Sand Com anies <br />g g p <br />and a development description for Arden Village. <br />Richard Denny, Sand Companies, reviewed the design standards that <br />Sand Companies was requesting flexibility on and explained why they <br />were requesting these changes. He explained that Arden Village <br />would meet the Minnesota Green Community requirements. <br />Chair Larson opened the floor to Commission questions. <br />Commissioner Modesette asked if management of their properties was <br />so important why they had built 5 5 buildings but only managed 20. <br />Mr. Thelen explained that several of the buildings they had built were <br />for third parties. He explained that all the buildings that Sand <br />Companies had built similar to the one being proposed in Arden Hills <br />have been retained and managed by Sand Companies. <br />Com�nissioner Zimmerman clarified that Lot 2 is a non-conforming <br />lot and the tower would be located on this property. He asked if the <br />potential hazards from the tower had been addressed such as if the <br />tower were to fall and if fencing around this property had been looked <br />at. <br />City Planner Beekman explained the tower was designed to collapse <br />onto itself if it were to be damaged so it would not fall outside of the <br />boundaries of Lot 2. <br />Mr. Thelen explained there were no current plans to completely fence <br />in the property. He did explain where the fencing was currently <br />located on the property. <br />Commissioner Reiff asked if the proposed trail along County Road F <br />would be on the applicant property. <br />