Laserfiche WebLink
James Lehnhoff, AICP <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Table 1 <br />Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis <br />Level of Service Results <br />December 7, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />Level of 5ervice <br />Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak <br />LOS Delay �l� LOS Delay �1� <br />County Road F and Hamline Avenue (Southbound} � B/F 90 sec. A/C 20 sec. <br />. <br />� <br />: :::::::::::::: :::::::: ::: ::::::::: <br />:::::::: :.::: : :: ; <br />, . :; <br />:::::::::: :::: <br />:''': �� �r.�n <br />Count Road F and Hamline Avenue Northbound A/C <br />20 sec. : :;::;:::F�T::: ::: :..�►.. .. <br />Y <br />� ) <br />County Road F and Boston Scientific West Driveway � A/B 10 sec. AB 10 sec. <br />County Road F and Innovation Way * A/B 10 sec. A/C 1 S sec. <br />County Road F and Lexington Avenue C 25 sec. D 40 sec. <br />�1� For signalized intersections, delays shown represent overall intersection delay. For unsignalized intersections, <br />delays shown represent the worst side-street approach. <br />* Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the <br />worst approach LOS. <br />Although the intersection of County Road F and Lexington Avenue currently operates at an <br />overall acceptable LOS D, the westbound approach currently experiences average delays of <br />approximately two and a half minutes during the p.m. peak hour. Typical queues on the <br />westbound approach were observed in the field to consistently be 10 to 15 vehicles in length <br />during the p.m. peak hour. The average and 95th percentile queue outputs from the micro- <br />simulation model at this intersection are approximately 250 feet and 500 feet, respectively. The <br />delays and queues at this intersection are caused by the conflict between westbound left-turning <br />vehicles and eastbound through and right-turning vehicles. Further complicating the situation is <br />the current geometrics at this intersection. The westbound geometrics include a shared left- <br />turn/through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane. However, there is only one lane on the <br />west approach to accept the two through lanes. This causes an unsafe condition and increased <br />delays by creating an unnecessary conflict. <br />To address the operational and safety issues previously mentioned, the following improvements <br />are recommended: <br />County Road F and Hamline Avenue <br />• To lmprove the operations to an acceptable LOS, a traffic signal would need to be <br />installed. However, the offset intersections between southbound and northbound <br />Hamline Avenue pose significant challenges in the design of the signal and cannot <br />address existing safety and geometric issues. Since there are no short-term cost effective <br />improvements that will significantly improve operations, no improvements were assumed <br />for build conditions. It should be noted that a long-term solution for the intersection was <br />identified in the I-694: 35E to 35W Environmental Assessment dated July 200� and is <br />included in the Appendix. The long-term solution will be discussed later in this memo. <br />