Laserfiche WebLink
c <br /> HILLS <br /> NI ENIORAN DUNI <br /> DATE: September 15, 2008 <br /> TO-- Mayor and City Council <br /> FRO NI: Ron oorse, Cott Administrator f <br /> SUBJECT: organizational Structure-Niblic Works Maintenance <br /> Goals <br /> The goals of the organizattonal structure of-the Public works maintenance function are as <br /> follows. <br /> The organizational structure reflects and enables the accomplishment of Public works <br /> maintenance goals and #tinctiolls <br /> Encourages a cohesive, cross-trained work group <br /> i Enables day-to-days operations to collsistend'y function well <br /> Options <br /> There are two main options for oroam-zin� the Public works Maintenance function <br /> A— Public works Superintendent mangling and supervising the 8-person maintenance crew <br /> �. P <br /> B_ Working foreman/foremen prop-idi111`da1:-to-dav work coordination and assiortments for <br /> the maintenance cre\v <br /> The follow ino, is an analy°sis of the pros all <br /> d cons of these two o Lions_ <br /> P <br /> A,.nalvsis <br /> Option A <br /> Pros-_ --The PSI Superintendent is a true supervisor, has supervisory authority, is <br /> independent of the labor union, and has a mana(2enient perspective <br /> --The Parr Superintendent has an overall perspective to assist in determining <br /> pnonties re: Streets. Parks, etc- <br /> --The Pw Superintendent has sufficient time to plan, ol-Uanize, schedule, and <br /> ass11011 multiple daily- projects for the 8-person crew- <br /> --Public Works employees have the opportunity to take on the role of project <br /> leader in the field- <br /> --This structure matches the philosophy of a cohesive, cross-trained pool of Public <br /> Works employees <br /> '..17eir -net aril nl��;c`•,1d��}jam- ��1 Administrator Gleacral J0ttjj1)en1c.RC'A's.RC A PW maim org struct.9-1 5,-0,R.doc <br />