My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1B, Public Works Maintenance Staffing & Workload
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
03-15-10-WS
>
1B, Public Works Maintenance Staffing & Workload
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 1:25:06 AM
Creation date
3/15/2010 2:12:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Public Works Maintenance Staffing
General - Type
Public Works Maintenance Staffing
Date
3/15/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
v <br /> ' a <br /> g <br /> 7112/2008 <br /> Page 2 <br /> --The Superintendent is focused on planning, organizing,scheduling and <br /> assigning work to enable the crew to operate efficiently and effectively <br /> Cans --The Superintendent is firnited in doing maintenance work <br /> --The Superintendent is on job sites less than a working foreman <br /> Option B <br /> Pros: --The working Foreman can assist with the work of the crew <br /> --The working Foremen can be on the work site more with the creel <br /> Cons: --A working foreman is not separated from the union,so does not have authority <br /> regarding personnel issues <br /> --A working foreman is pulled between organizing 1-vork and doing work_ This <br /> can create tension, and can reduce the productivity of the crew i f too much time is spent doing <br /> vs_ organizing work- <br /> --A working foreman is generally focused on one or two aspects of maintenance <br /> operations,i_e_ water,or water and sewer, which does not facilitate priority setting among the <br /> multiple maintenance operations, i_e_ streets, parks, water, sewer, storm sewer, fleet maintenance_ <br /> --with a crew of 8,(with an additional 7 seasonal workers during the busiest <br /> portion of the year)and multiple maintenance activities. a single working foreman could not <br /> plan, schedule, and organize the work of the crew and still operate as a working foreman_ <br /> Either the "working"element would suffer, or the"'foreman"element would suffer- <br /> --multiple working foremen would be needed to manage the Public works <br /> maintenance operation_ Looking ahead to the development of TCAA-P, the scope of- <br /> maintenance operations will increase substantially, as well as the size of the crew, <br /> making it more difficult to manage the crew with one or more working foremen- <br /> --With two or more working foremen, the amount of time spent organizing work <br /> vs_ doing work becomes equivalent to a full-time maintenance position, resulting in a de facto <br /> loss of a maintenance position,although there are "workiwo_" foremen- <br /> --Having multiple working foremen reduces or eliminates the opportunity for <br /> maintenance workers to serve as project leaders at work sites <br /> --Assigning multiple working foremen to oversee specs operational areas can <br /> erode the philosophy of a cohesive group of cross-trained maintenance workers, as the working _ <br /> foremen will be focused on their specific operational areas, and will tend to surround themselves <br /> with crew members who have the same focus- <br /> -- working foremen focused on one or two operational areas will have a more <br /> difficult time coordinating among themselves in terms of priority setting regarding the needs of <br /> the various operational areas- <br /> Recommend ation <br /> On the basis of the above analysis, it is recommended that the Public works maintenance <br /> operation be managed by a Public works superintendent_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.