Laserfiche WebLink
plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and <br />approval by the Planning Cornmission. <br />2. The applicant shall use best management practices (BMPs) to control <br />erosion at all times during construction. <br />3. The applicant shall obtain approval or a waiver from the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District prior to the issuance of any building permit. <br />4. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. <br />5. The addition will match the color and siding of the existing structure. <br />Chair Larson opened the floor to Commission questions. <br />Chair Larson asked if the other homes in the cul-de-sac meet the setbacks and if <br />there are any variances for these other homes. He also asked if most of the homes <br />in this area are split level homes. <br />City Planner Beekman stated most of the homes in this area do encroach a few <br />feet into the front yard setback but she is not aware of any variances. She was not <br />sure what the floor plans were for the other homes in the neighborhood but <br />assumes they are similar since they were built around the same time. <br />Commissioner Hames clarified the neighborhood appeared to be a combination of <br />split level and two story homes. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman clarified if this addition was constructed as a front <br />porch rather than an enclosed entryway it would be allowed under the City Code. <br />He asked the Commission if this request would be considered a matter of <br />semantics. <br />City Planner Beekman stated the City Code does allow 25% encroachment into <br />the front yard setback for a front porch. <br />Chair Larson stated the addition is considered a living area because it is enclosed <br />and heated and this would not qualify it as a front porch according to the <br />ordinance. <br />Commissioner Hames moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to <br />recommend approval of Plannin� Case 10-007 for a variance at 1146 Waldon <br />Place based on the findin�s of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by <br />the �ve conditions in the May 5, 2010, plannin� case report. <br />Commissioner Hames explained her reason for recommending approval are the <br />circumstances unique to the property in the inverted radius on a pie shaped lot <br />don't reasonably allow for a square structure or addition and this addition would <br />add to the home and the neighborhood. <br />