My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.B, 2011 Preliminary Budget Discussion
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
06-21-10-WS
>
2.B, 2011 Preliminary Budget Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 12:19:54 AM
Creation date
6/18/2010 11:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
2011 Preliminary Budget Discussion
General - Type
2011 Preliminary Budget Discussion
Date
6/21/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
H EN ILLS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: June 21, 2010 Item 2.B <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> FROM: Sue Iverson, Finance Director/Treasurer <br /> SUBJECT: 2011 Preliminary Budget Discussion <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> The City staff is in the process of developing a Preliminary 2011 Budget. As we progress <br /> forward and take the necessary steps, staff needs general direction and guidance from the <br /> Council with regards to changes for the coming year. <br /> As of this time, we are under levy limits for 2011. The Implicit price deflator (IPD) cannot be <br /> below zero. Current estimates are at 1.68%. The Minnesota Department of Revenue sets this in <br /> early July, so we do not have the actual number yet. We did not levy to our full maximum last <br /> year when we take into account special levies, I will have an estimate of what amount we could <br /> be looking at for the worksession on Monday evening. <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> Preliminarily, staff has identified a number of factors that will influence the 2011 Budget. Some <br /> are identified as follows: <br /> • Tax Levy—what is the Council's comfort level? Last year was a 2.3% increase. A 1% <br /> levy increase translates to approximately$25,000. <br /> • Another area where staff sees a need is in park funding. Park dedication fees are <br /> generally limited to capital improvements not general repair and maintenance items and <br /> they are not a steady stream of income. In looking at the financial plan, staff sees a need <br /> to set up a reserve for park improvements. This fund would then be a funding source for <br /> items which are included in the CIP. <br /> • Personnel—Council and staff have been discussing these issues over past few months and <br /> we are in the process of hiring a public works maintenance worker and a public work <br /> director. We have contracted for more engineering hours with Roseville and anticipate <br /> that we will reevaluate this once the Public Works department is fully staffed. <br /> • Overall budget increases—preferences/limits? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.