Laserfiche WebLink
Memo <br /> 2009 Budget Memo <br /> 2 <br /> • Salaries and Benefits. The Council did a market study and updated our pay scales in <br /> December of 2007. We did not have a COLA increase in 2010 for non-union employees. <br /> The union contract expires on December 31, 2010. The union employees did have a <br /> COLA increase of 3% for 2010. Would the Council like staff to run various alternatives <br /> during the budget process this year? What research would Council like staff to re are? <br /> p P <br /> • Increase in employee benefits costs (health and dental). We do not yet have preliminary <br /> numbers for these costs yet,but will be getting these in the next few months. Our <br /> insurance pool went out for bids and rates last year and we received only a 1% in crease <br /> overall. We did go out for various bids with other firms last year and we did not <br /> experience favorable rates. Staff recommends staying with the current insurance provider <br /> at this time. Until we get the actual numbers, a 15% increase will be used. The current <br /> City contribution towards health and dental is $680.21 per month. Over the past few <br /> years, the Council had approved budgeting for 50% of the increase in premium. In other <br /> words, the City equally shared the rate increase with the employees. In 2008, the Council <br /> approved budgeting for 50% of the increase,but also added an additional plan with a <br /> deductible at a lower cost (HSA). This plan was available to employees with the same <br /> City contribution as the co-pay plan, as they were taking on more of the risk,but <br /> participation in the plan would reduce city overall costs. Additionally, only those who <br /> took the new HSA plan are receiving the full City contribution if there is any remaining <br /> after health insurance premiums, this provided an incentive to employees to convert to <br /> the new plan. Would this be an appropriate formula to continue to use for budget <br /> purposes? <br /> • Update the five year CIP. The Council reviewed this in January and we will be <br /> discussing this at the worksession on Monday evening. <br /> • As a step in creating a quality budget document, performance measures/service indicators <br /> need to be established for each department. Some of these may come about as a result of <br /> the community survey(if one is done) as areas that the Council would like to improve. <br /> Goals and objectives also need to be established for each department. These would need <br /> to be established in 2011, then in subsequent years actual performance can be tracked to <br /> show progress against these goals. This would provide Council and the public another <br /> tool to evaluate city services. Staff would appreciate input from the Council on this <br /> matter. <br /> RECOMMENDED ACTION: <br /> Staff is seeking direction from the Council as it continues with the 2010 n Bud eti process. <br /> Budgeting <br />