Laserfiche WebLink
- ��. EI�' HIL,LS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: September 13, 2�10 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br />FR4M: Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br />SUBJECT: Proposed 2011 Budget Adjustments <br />Back�round <br />_ <br />At the August 16, 2010 Council work session, the preliminary 201 l city budget was <br />presented and reviewed. The main topics of discussion were the tax levy, the general fund <br />operating expenditures, and stafiing levels. Toward the end of the discussion, a list of <br />options for adjusting the budget by ten percent (10%) was requested. <br />General Fund proposal for 2011 <br />Before evaluating the list of options for budget adj ustments, it is appropriate to review the <br />2011 proposal and comment on some of the important parts of the budget. <br />The first item to note is that the budget is a work in progress as more data and information <br />becomes available and as decisions are made by the Council. For example, having a 2% <br />maximum COLA increase in the budget versus the 3% that was in the draft that the Council <br />reviewed on August 16th. Accordingly, the figures noted in this memo will be slightly <br />different than what the Council saw on Au ust 16th. <br />g <br />The General Fund budget is proposed at $3,936,344 which is a$105,187 or 2.75% increase <br />in revenues. <br />The tax levy is proposed at $3,088,964 which is a$72,499 or 2.4% increase. <br />The Public Safety category (Fire, Sheriff s Contract, Animal Control, and Dispatching <br />Services) is $1,362,223. This is a$53,323 or 4.07% increase. This category is already set <br />for 2011. <br />The Personnel Services function, without any increases in staffing, wages or benefits, is <br />proposed at $1,308,841. This is a$8,404 or .65% increase. Unless there are going to be <br />staff reductions, cuts in staff hours, staff furloughs, or the city is not going to fill some <br />