My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7A, Adopt 2010 Operating Levy Payable in 2011 & Establish the 2010 Truth-In-Taxation Hearing Date
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
09-13-10-R
>
7A, Adopt 2010 Operating Levy Payable in 2011 & Establish the 2010 Truth-In-Taxation Hearing Date
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:15:21 AM
Creation date
9/20/2010 10:48:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Adopt 2010 Operating Levy
General - Type
2010 Truth-In-Taxation Hearing
Date
9/13/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vacant positions (i.e. the Community Development Director position), then only minor <br />reductions can take place from what is in the proposed 2011 budget. These minor <br />reductions would be in the area of not replacing all or some of the interns, the high school <br />student worker, and the temporary/seasonal workers (mainly in street, parks, and <br />recreation). <br />There are no cross over expenses between the Public Safety category and the Personnel <br />Services function as all of the Public Safety expenses are contracted services. Therefore, if <br />most of these two budget activities are off limits for cuts, then we are looking at a total of <br />$1,265,13 8 being available for possible reductions in the budget. <br />Attachment A displays the above comments. <br />Regarding specific expenditures in the budget, a few comments should be made about: <br />TCAAP, the Professional Services line item in the Administration and Planning budgets, <br />the Community Survey, Emergency Management, and the Transfers budget. <br />The TC1��AP expenses and revenues are listed as a Special Revenue Fund. However, there <br />is a problem with this budget. While the $70,000 expenditure estimate may be accurate; <br />there is no source of revenue identified. The $70,000 in revenues is listed under the <br />"contributions and donations" line item and maybe a developer will pay for these expenses; <br />but it much more likely that the expenses will be financed from the General Fund within the <br />Professional Services line item in the Administration and Planning budgets. Therefore <br />reductions in these two General Fund line items will be difficult to recommend. <br />The Community Survey will be pursued in either late 2010 or in early 2011. There are no <br />funds speci� cally identified for this proj ect, so the most appropriate line item would be <br />Professional Services in Planning if the survey takes place in 2011. <br />The Emergency Management budget includes $10,000 for Professional Services. This is a <br />new expenditure. I would like to present a proposal to the Council from Lance Ross, <br />Emergency Preparedness Resource Group LLC, for an Emergency Management Services <br />contract at a future work session. <br />The Council deserves a great deal of credit for establishing the Transfer budget. This <br />program of moving funds into designated capital reserves is a sound financial management <br />practice. If these transfers were to be eliminated in an upcoming year, then it would be <br />dif� cult to reestablish these expenditures without a corresponding increase in the tax levy. <br />To not do the transfers may constitute a structural change in the budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.