7A, Arden Hall Planned Unit Development & Zoning Code Amendment

Home Browse Search

September 8, 2010, Planning Commission Minutes Planning Case 10 -009; Zoning Code Amendment, Preliminary and Final Plat, and Master and Final PUD; 1201 W. County Road E; TAT Properties Public Hearing City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the applicant has requested a Zoning Code Amendment, Preliminary and Final Plat, and Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow the existing student housing facility located at 1201 County Road E, the former Holiday Inn site, to convert from an interim use to a permanent use. She provided additional background information. The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application meets the requirements of the Zoning Code, advances the goals and principle within the Guiding Plan for the B -2 District, and would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole. Staff offers the following seventeen findings for consideration: General Findings: 1. If the proposed Zoning Code changes in Planning Case 10 -009 are approved, institutional housing would be a permitted use, under certain circumstances, with an approved PUD, in the B -2 District. 2. The Master and Final PUD process allows flexibility with the implementation of the City's subdivision and zoning regulations. 3. The proposal is not anticipated to adversely impact nearby properties through nuisance, noise, dust, glare, or unsightliness, and will not otherwise adversely impact the health, safety, and welfare of the community because the use is located in a commercial district, has been in operation since September 2008 and has not caused any adverse impacts, and will be aesthetically improved by the proposed landscaping improvements. 4. The proposal would not increase parking and traffic on the site compared to existing conditions. In addition, Northwestern College intends to continue shuttle service between the property and the College. 5. The proposal is in keeping with many of the principles of the Guiding Plan for the B -2 District due to the existing configuration of the site, and the addition of Lot 2 as a development opportunity in the B -2 District. 6. The proposal does not advance the principles of the Guiding Plan for the B -2 District, because it inhibits the realignment of the accesses on the site, the design standards for new construction are not being met, and the orientation of the development does not include a green space. 7. There are no delinquent property taxes, special assessments, interest, or City utility fees due upon the subject parcel. On the Proposed Special Requirements for Interim Uses in the B -2 District: 8. The building to be used will be upgraded to meet all applicable building and fire codes. 9. Each room will have its own bathroom.