Laserfiche WebLink
L� <br /> Mr. March noted the property owners are not required to hook up to municipal water until the <br /> property's current well malfunctions or until the property owner elects to hook up. <br /> The proposed improvements will supply utility services to 42 lots in Parkview. The City of <br /> Centerville will pay the additional cost to over sizing the watermain. The project cost for <br /> development improvements and overheard (engineering, legal, administration) is $526,126.95. <br /> The total project costs with alternatives one and two is $580,443.53. <br /> Mr. Bernard Hendrich (6945 Centerville Road) questioned if the watermain will be a dead end <br /> and if so, how will the stagnated waters be treated. Mr. Nyberg replied if the Council decides to <br /> run the watermain south there will be a dead -end line which will be maintained by the City with <br /> routine hydrant flushing. <br /> Mr. Robert Barett (6953 Centerville Road) questioned who will pay the cost for directional <br /> boring under the Centerville Road. Mr. Nyberg explained the City will pay the cost for directional <br /> boring. Also, Mr. Barett asked "Will the City apply the assessment cost to the properties now or <br /> can the assessment be deferred ?" Mr. Nyberg mentioned the City plans to meet with the City <br /> Bond Councilor and then the City will know what options are available. <br /> Mr. John Rieder (6977 Centerville Road) questioned the advantages and disadvantage to options <br /> one and two. Mr. Nyberg noted that option one will provide service to the Senior Housing <br /> facility which will loop the system and will enable the City to close off the water if there is a break <br /> in the line. Option two provides service to three residents on the south end of Center Street. <br /> Furthermore, the disadvantages are construction disruption and the dead -end line will need to be <br /> maintained. <br /> Mr. Andrew Melcher (Saint Genevieve 7087 Goiffon Road) commented since one option is to <br /> provide water service to the Senior Housing facility then why is that facility not assessed. Mr. <br /> Nyberg responded the City can assess the facility. However, the City would pay the assessment <br /> cost. <br /> Mr. Melcher questioned the Council if the statutes state that a property cannot be assessed twice <br /> for the same improvement. Mr. March commented he spoke with the City Attorney and a <br /> property cannot be assessed twice for the same improvement. <br /> Mr. Hendrich asked "Will both water and storm sewer services be provided ?" Mr. Nyberg <br /> explained the proposed assessment is for water service. <br /> Mr. Barett asked "Where will the water from the development drain to ?" Mr. Nyberg stated Mr. <br /> Carlson has to prove the run off from the development will not cause an increase to surrounding <br /> properties. <br /> Mayor Wilharber mentioned, if the bid amount is lower than what the city expects the proposed <br /> 2 <br />