1997-11-24 - CC Packet - (Admin.)

Home Browse Search

19. Ability of the consultant to furnish adequate and effective construction supervi- APPENDIX Sion services, where such services are an inherent pan of a "package" of services for SAMPLE CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS CRITERIA LIST which the consultant is employed The sample list given below is generally based on one used successfully (without 20. Financial stability and capaci ty of the consultant to carry oul the kinds and extent significant controversy) for over 25 years by a medium -size city which engages of work needed consultants for die bulk of its design work. 21. Availability to the consultant of adequate amounts and forms of liability and 1. Educational background of key consultant personnel professional responsibility insurance 2. Experience record of the consultant team 22. Whether the consultant has offered an appropriate response to relevant policy 3. Record of success by the consultant, demonstrated by work previously per - regarding involvement of minorities, women, disadvantaged business, affinnative fonned for the agency or similar work performed for others action, etc. 4. Individual within the consultant's organization who w i l l have direct charge of 23.Other factors or special characteristics of the firth, its project team, or its outlook the work which provide a unique match with the agency's needs and/or objectives 5. Whether the consultant has adequate staff or other resources such as sub- The above ciiieria reflect important considerations, in botlitechnical and policy consultants to perform the work within the time allowance areas. Agencies may desire to add othercriteria and /or assign weighty to the various 6. The approach the consultant proposes to use for the work criteria to guide or assist interview panel members. 7. The abilily of the consultant to make effective public presentations of the report and /or design as may be required 8. The ability of the consultant to work effectively witlt agency staff, other public agencies, and related parties as may be required during the course of the design, study, or other technical services 9. Pertinent new ideas which may be presented by the consultant during the course of tine selection process 10. Where appropriate, whether the consultant has adequate knowledge of local conditions 11. Whether the consultant has supplementary technical certifications appropriate to the work involved 12. Whether the consultant has available experienced, capable, and acceptable resource and design professional personnel or consultants as may be pertinent to the particular project 13. Whether the consultant has demonstrated an appropriate level of effort as reflected by person -hours and classification of personnel allocated to the various tasks 14. Demonstrated continuing interest by the consultant in the success, eff icicncy, and workability of facilities the consultant has designed, both during construction and after they are placed in operation 15. Whether the consultant is already engaged in another project which has direct and substantial physical relationship to the proposed project 16. When an existing facility is being modified or added to, whether tie original designer of the facility should be retained for are new work on grounds of economy, detailed knowledge of the existing facility, or esthetic or technical necessity of involving the same design philosophy 17. Whether the consultant has an cflective qualily conuol progrun, such as independent design review 18. "fheconsullant's record of kecpingcon.cuuclion coslx within project budgets anal design estimates 18