My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-12-10 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2003
>
2003-12-10 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2007 3:40:29 PM
Creation date
2/9/2006 11:20:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />said that the minutes referenced land in Hugo costing $27,000 per acre and here it is <br />$45,000 to $55,000 and asked why. <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney indicated that price was with the acquisition of the properties and the <br />tearing down of the substandard buildings and soil corrections. He then indicated that the <br />costs double the land cost to the developer and that puts the cost of the townhomes out of <br />reach. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilke indicated that this may be a great addition and asked Council to have an open <br />mind and do what is fair after reviewing all the facts. <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney indicated he did not personally ask for this to be on tonight's agenda and <br />assumes that it is on the agenda because of the discussion at the last meeting. He then <br />said that if he heard from enough people that this was not a good idea for the City and <br />that they did not want it he would consider changing his mind. But, if it is the other way <br />around, and the majority of public input indicates this is a good idea for the City he <br />would continue to support it. He further commented that he would not say that he will <br />not change his mind because he does not agree with that and feels the information and <br />public input should be considered before a decision is made. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that this does not move forward without a <br />formal application for rezoning and then it would go through the public hearing process <br />and bring in more resident input. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she wanted to hear what people think <br />whether they think it is good or bad she wants to know why. She then said that <br />ultimately, her responsibility is not to vote for the greatest number of people her <br />responsibility is to vote for what is in the best interest of the City as a whole. She further <br />commented that there was a whole group of residents at the meeting earlier on an <br />assessment matter that feel they were voted against because Council voted on behalf of <br />the entire City. <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney indicated he has an open mind and will listen to reason and will listen to <br />those that say do it or not do it before he makes his final decision. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested the Council separate the issues and <br />determine whether the property will be rezoned and then whether TIF would be <br />approved. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra commented that the developer would not come in without the <br />TIF. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra indicated that she has contacted people and done research and <br />made her decision off of the information she has. She then said that she is opposed to <br />rezoning to residential but would be open to listening to any comments on commercial. <br /> <br />Page 15 of19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.