My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-12-10 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2003
>
2003-12-10 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2007 3:40:29 PM
Creation date
2/9/2006 11:20:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Member Paar indicated that he did some research and made calls on his own <br />with the limited time he has. He then said that this whole proposal caught him off guard <br />when it was brought up at a meeting and he knew nothing of it. He further commented <br />that his opinion should not surprise people because he ran on a platform of residential <br />growth being out of control versus commercial growth and was elected because people <br />agreed with him. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that there are good things that could come from the <br />proposal but there is no way of being sure that there will not be TIP issues. He then said <br />he takes offense to the comments that two Council Members are too stubborn to change <br />their minds because he has changed his mind in the past on a decision he made without <br />all the facts. When he obtained the facts and found that he should have made a different <br />decision, he did that. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that he has received only emails and 'calls in support of <br />his decision and not one that said he made a bad decision. He then said that he is doing <br />what he feels. is best for the City and, if he is not representing the people how they want <br />to be represented, the next election could take care of that. He further commented that he <br />believes that the residential growth is outpacing the commercial and while TIF and <br />townhomes are not necessarily a bad thing he does not feel it is right for the City at this <br />time. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that he has done research and considered the proposal <br />but has not been provided with any additional information or facts that would make him <br />change his mind. He then said that he would listen to any additional information and <br />public comment and is open minded but has yet to hear anything that provides him with <br />facts to change his opinion. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee commented that things are different, actually being on the Council <br />than when running. He then asked that Council listen to the facts and consider the public <br />input and not make decisions based solely on campaign promises. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated there are other issues with this proposal other than just <br />his campaign. He then said that townhomes have the potential to cause issues with <br />policing and he is concerned with using TIF for residential. He further commented that <br />there is a lot of play in the numbers being presented and he has not actually seen a true <br />estimate of costs to do the soil corrections and demolitions necessary so he does not have <br />those facts to consider. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that his decision is not based solely on what he <br />campaigned on but because he does not feel this is a good thing for the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Keheler indicated that it was not the intent of the developer to spring this on Council <br />and he apologized for not knowing how the process worked. He then said that he is more <br />than willing to sit down with Council individually or as a whole and provide more refined <br />figures and discuss the proposal further. <br /> <br />Page 16 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.