My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-10-22 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2003
>
2003-10-22 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:55:43 PM
Creation date
2/9/2006 3:38:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />October 8, 2003 <br />COlDlcil Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Council set a work session for Monday, October 20,2003 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss TIF and <br />economic development. <br /> <br />3. Ordinance #4 - Zoning Permit Amendment (Accessory Structures/Fences) <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff had proposed the idea of a permit for accessory <br />structures and fences to the Planning and Zoning Commission previously as a way of <br />eliminating or reducing some of the issues Staff has with them, but the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission was not in favor of adding another permit fee. She then said that <br />Staff would like to suggest that the permit fee for accessory structures and fences be <br />reconsidered. <br /> <br />Council directed Staff to have the Planning and Zoning Commission discuss the matter <br />and come to Councii with a recommendation on an appropriate permitting fee for <br />accessory structures and fences. <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney asked that Staff and the Commission consider the fee carefully and <br />assure that it covers Staff time but is not too high because the permit process will not help <br />Staff if residents feel it is too high and do not apply for permits. <br /> <br />4. Parks and Recreation Committee Recommendation <br /> <br />Council indicated this recommendation should be held over until it is determined whether <br />the development will proceed. <br /> <br />vm. OLD BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Pheasant Marsh. Phase ill - Developer's Agreement & Final Plat <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated this item was tabled from the last meeting. <br /> <br />Council M~mber Capra asked whether there had been any progress on the issue of the <br />waiver. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he has no issue with regard to the sidewalk, trailways <br />and mailbox language added by Staff. He then commented that Mr. Runkle may wish to <br />comment on the escrow for the mailboxes. <br /> <br />Mr. Dale Runkle, Ground Development, indicated that he does have a concern about the <br />escrow for the mailboxes as it was not required in the other two phases and mailboxes <br />were installed. He then said that they have arrangements in place to have the mailboxes <br />installed and he does not feel the need for another escrow. He also commented that he <br />does not see where the ordinance requires it. <br /> <br />Mr. Runkle indicated he was concerned with the language added on the top of Page 6 <br />where it says the developer will construct concrete sidewalk on the north and west side of <br /> <br />Page 60f14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.