My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-08-13 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2003
>
2003-08-13 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:56:14 PM
Creation date
2/10/2006 1:00:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Attorney Hoeft suggested a motion that final plat approval be subject to the <br />developer's agreement and deeding to the City of Outlot B if that is Council desire. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that he does not want the park piece. <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney indicated that he did not remember being in favor of it before and <br />remembers discussing this when they were newly elected. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra indicated that she believes the park property was done as a <br />concession because the neighbors wanted the 10% for parkland. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that his concern is that with the people in Lots 1, 2, or 3 <br />having liability because people are fishing on their property and whether they would want <br />that. He then said it was a nice gesture and he is not trying to vote against parks or <br />fishing but he feels, as a property owner, there would be issues with that. <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney indicated that he would not want to buy a lot with a situation like that <br />having to see people fishing on your property. He then said that he does not want the <br />City to own the property but someone else. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra indicated the whole point of the proposal was to avoid having to <br />make the kids ask for permission to fish. She then said that this parkland piece was <br />promised to residents and she believes Council is going back on what was previously <br />decided. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the City is not obligated in any fashion on this based <br />on prior discussions. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member Paar <br />to approve the final plat for Peltier Preserve subiect to the approval of the <br />developer's a2l"eement. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson commented that the easement along the south side of Lot 1 was moved. Mr. <br />Gonyea indicated that the easement was moved to move the sewer and save as many trees <br />as possible. <br /> <br />Council Member C~rT~ itldicated that she felt that-&mncil was letting residents\lown <br />with regard to the park. <br /> <br />VOTE: Aves - 3. Navs - 2 (Lee/Capra). Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council recessed at 9:28 p.m. <br />Council reconvened at 9:35 p.m. <br /> <br />Page 17 of24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.