Laserfiche WebLink
<br />',.-, <br />;:......-:-... ...~ <br />....:..:,."i. <br />...,'.:.; :..<:::_\-:~ .~1 <br />.~..,:,.:,,::}l <br /> <br />..r.:.....\..,.. <br /> <br />f~~~~r <br /> <br />i....:........ <br />f' <br /> <br />{'~}" <br />. '-..:--'....., <br />~~ <br /> <br />Phwaing &-Zoning-:M:aj 4, 1999 <br /> <br />The Commission explained the neighboring property owner was granted a variance due to <br />tb:e-fact l.llid LheLe'was no ~i:UA!$C 011 site:-. Also;-ollu:a }JI0PCll.y'owners'enjoy-rights that <br />are not shared by the neighboring property. <br /> <br />'fhe-€u.Ll.lilJission: discussed: <br />OuJirnu1ce #4 Section: 65:63-1 Special-~uJiLiotlS and'circumst:ances'"~l which <br />are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the <br />C1cLions of.the petitioIl~. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed: <br />* Possible'safety-haza{ds <br />*- Dilapidated' build:iJJ.gs 1W1y be condc:au.l1ed' Ll1:Scd on-the recently C1llopled ho~g <br />code. . <br /> <br />Ms; Linda- Broussard- Vickers expressed ~.ace1n aboul no~orming-issues--a:nd- the <br />tabling of similar types of items. Ms. Broussard Vickers suggested to table until after <br />Ordinanceif4is-estab~ed. <br /> <br />Mutiou b,y Linda"BrolUlNU d Vicke.'s, .,a;u4ded b,y AI- bIMotte to table lhi., requ.,est <br />until the Commission completes the research on Ordinance #4. Motion carried : <br />III1~U:II.u~ly. <br /> <br />€entennial-S~b.ool'Didl id .. Val :aIlCC I cquC'il CUI Sil;u LtstaDation <br /> <br />The Commission discussed, in great depth, any way to grant the variance in conjunction <br />with. Ordinance-#4~ Secti.on: <br />65.03-1 . <br />65'.O~-2 <br />65.03-3 <br />65:03-4 <br /> <br />Mr:- Palzersuggested'whe.a theCo~l)iuu lewlitcs Oldiuc:utwc'#4: Signs; I.Lc1l pe1~PS <br />the provision should be considered for properties contiguous to County Roads. . <br /> <br />'Fhe-<:ommission'suggested- Staff mea.sul e the-right-of=.way and' easement-distance. 1,'he <br />Commission felt safer having the sign installed closer to Main Street. Furthermore, the <br />sign: ordinance' will need' to- be-updated-in- orderto-consider pending concerns. <br /> <br />Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Brain Hanson to table the <br />CentenniafScbool District's variance-requesHo-instaH a sign based-on-the-fact-~at <br />it does not conform to the variance standards, and to update the sign ordinance in <br />an-attempt.to'i-e-address-the-request-in.the future;- MOtioil 'carried uiliU1imou~ly. <br /> <br />~t DISCUSSION ITEMS: <br />~ <br /> <br />4 <br />