My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-23 Stantec Ltr. Re. CSAH21 Improvements Provided @ Worksession
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2013
>
2013-01-23 Stantec Ltr. Re. CSAH21 Improvements Provided @ Worksession
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2013 10:39:49 AM
Creation date
1/24/2013 10:38:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stantec <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Dupree Road to Southern City Limits <br />The county's current plan shows this area proposed as: <br />• Two -lane rural section roadway <br />• Right turn lanes <br />• 4' paved shoulders where there are no turn lanes <br />• Reclaim - shape- and -pave type improvement <br />• No trails or sidewalks <br />This area is yet to be developed and lends itself to a rural section roadway. <br />We encourage the city to support the current design in this section. There should be no cost to the city for <br />this segment. <br />Trunk Storm Sewer /Stormwater Treatment <br />As you are aware, the City's ultimate plan for the Downtown Redevelopment and for its Downtown <br />Stormwater Reclamation Project necessitates the construction of a 42 -inch pipe coming from the intersection <br />of Centerville Road (CSAH 21) and Sorel Street, south to a discharge point leading into the ditch along the <br />south side of LaMotte Park. <br />The County will need to construct a storm sewer system in areas of urban section roadway and may need to <br />provide stormwater treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the project. Those BMPs could include <br />infiltration features, storm ponds and the like. <br />If the City wishes to construct the 42 -inch pipe now and enter into a joint powers agreement to share that <br />pipe with the County, it could likely handle both the County's storm water and the City's future runoff from <br />the Downtown Redevelopment. If not, a slightly larger pipe probably could. In either case, it would likely be <br />mutually beneficial to share the pipe and therefore realize savings by sharing the cost. Each party might pay <br />a percentage of the pipe's cost based on its contribution to the flow or the County could contribute the <br />equivalent cost of the system they would have needed on their own. <br />The pipe could be constructed under the county's contract, with the City's portion of the cost becoming part <br />of its share of the project costs. <br />Finally, a similar agreement could be reached to have the County share the City's Stormwater Reclamation <br />Facility to the extent in needs to provide treatment or infiltration. <br />Sidewalks and Trails <br />During the course of several design meetings, the logistics of certain trail segments has been discussed. <br />There are many factors which affect the viability of a trail. A few things to note are: <br />• The County views trails as a City cost <br />• If additional right -of -way is necessary because of a trail, they would view that as a City cost <br />• If additional wetland mitigation was necessary because of a trail, they would view that as a City cost. <br />There are areas of significant wetland impact between Hunter's Trail and Dupre Rd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.