My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-23 Stantec Ltr. Re. CSAH21 Improvements Provided @ Worksession
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2013
>
2013-01-23 Stantec Ltr. Re. CSAH21 Improvements Provided @ Worksession
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2013 10:39:49 AM
Creation date
1/24/2013 10:38:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stan>tc <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />The reimbursement program we took advantage of on CSAH 14, only covers the material cost of the <br />trail and does not include any grading or other ancillary costs as mentioned above. Also, it is not <br />certain that a trail along Centerville Road would be considered eligible for this reimbursement. <br />The City of Lino Lakes has stated that, for a variety of reasons, they do not plan on pursuing the <br />construction of a trail along their segment of this project (Birch St. to Centerville's southern City <br />Limits). This means that an extension of a trail along CSAH 21 in Centerville's portion of the project <br />would likely terminate with a dead end. <br />Weighing all of these factors, if a segment of trail is to be constructed, it should be one of high priority, with <br />a significant benefit to the safety and convenience of the public. The existing trail crossing between Hunter's <br />Trail and Dupre Road is one which the County does not wish to perpetuate. If a trail was constructed along <br />the east side of Centerville Road, between this crossing and the trail crossing at Meadow Lane, it may offer <br />an alternative to trail users wishing to cross at a safer, better marked location. However, forcing people to <br />use this alternative could be difficult. The council should weigh the pros and cons of the construction of this <br />segment. Other segments do not appear to offer enough benefit at this time, to justify the added expense. <br />Sincerely, <br />STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. <br />Mark Statz, PE <br />City Engineer <br />651 - 604 -4709 <br />Attachments: Marked up portions of the County's Draft Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.