My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-07-22 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2015
>
2015-07-22 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2015 3:19:40 PM
Creation date
7/17/2015 3:18:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
impacts of a specific development proposal. <br /> 21.4 Work with appropriate road authorities to mitigate the impact of the additional This mitigation measure is ongoing <br /> traffic on the on the regional system,specifically Interstates 35W and 35E,by <br /> reconstructing each to provide a six-lane cross-section consistent with the <br /> recommendations outlined in the I-35 IRC. It should be noted that it was <br /> determined that an expansion will be necessary even without the development <br /> scenarios used in this analysis. As the interstates serve a much larger area,the <br /> projected growth of the entire Twin Cities region should warrant expansion by the <br /> year 2030. <br /> 21.5 Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study area and require project This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br /> proposers to address alternative travel modes(e.g.,buses,bicyclists,and <br /> pedestrians)by identifying appropriate accommodations. <br /> 21.6 Consider the need for additional infrastructure improvements(see item#21.2)in This mitigation measure is ongoing <br /> future updates or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Submit the plan update <br /> to the appropriate agencies(i.e.,FHWA,MnDOT,Met Council,etc.). <br /> 21.7 Require project proposers to follow all appropriate guidelines and policies related This mitigation measure is ongoing <br /> to traffic nose and noise walls. <br /> 21.8 Require that site plans for each of the developments include measures such as This mitigation measure is ongoing <br /> appropriate setback distances,earthen berms,noise walls,and appropriate site <br /> design to reduce the impact of traffic noise to residential areas. <br /> 21.9 Continue to require the implementation of the conditions of approval for the Eagle This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br /> Brook Church relating to mitigating traffic impacts. <br /> 21.10 Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by requiring that site plans make This mitigation measure is ongoing <br /> use of access management practices to promote safe,effective traffic flow. <br /> 21.11 Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County Highway Department This mitigation measure is ongoing and has <br /> Development Review Process Manual(updated June 2013.) been updated to reflect the newest manual. <br /> 14 Mitigation Plan Update -2015 June 3,2015 <br /> 74 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.