Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />Citizen Statements. and Qaestns on Peltier Preserve Addition. <br /> <br />We cha11m1ae the <mrent City CotnJcI1 to be p1~ . . and thiDkGside of the box, in their appao8d1 to city <br />iwprovemonts and ~ lather tbaa IaICtive and past. solutions. <br /> <br />We feel that utility lJUrintensmce issues be dealt with as with city t1mdi1'lg from mainpumce accowdS. An 01IIlCC of <br />~ _worth a pound ofcure. These ~wdS should fi~ from propert, tax and developer and cc;....~ utility <br />. use fees such as road use permit fees for JCUiug to and . 1brm CODSb:ac:tion sites along with l~ of actual <br />4PmS\IP- <br /> <br />CoDstruction ofutiJilies should be dealt with from the <br />yeatS and pay acfdjti()n~l1 taxes on utiJity valuations that <br />dealt with as "cause foi'". In other words why does it need <br />the installer should pay, or was there ~ due to <br /> <br /> <br />. ofwho wiJl proJit, not who may recoup their cost in 10 to 20 <br />be questicmable and not be essentiAl RecoosaluCtion",d be <br />be rec:onstmcted was the work clone poorly the first time, then <br />then the miss-user should pay the cost. . <br /> <br />Wbenwill the Water and ~~8&.beready? <br />(as passed at the 212612003 COUIIQI1. ~., I <br />Has the scope of this stUdy been ~eted. if not when wiD it be done, and when it is done, wm it be available for public <br />0{)t1Unent1 <br /> <br />Will this stqcly be used in the p1pni1tg for Mill Rd., Peltier ~ Dr., Peltier Cr. and CeDtervil1e Rd., in reJatioml to the <br />Peltier Prese.a:te ~~? <br />If NO what wiJl be the criteria for proposiDg .iwp~lto tile above area? <br />Of the $817.000.00, projected city utilities costs for the Pe1tfer Preserve please outline ~ details. That is: <br />What ate the projected. item costs for the project? <br />Streets? <br />Stotm fIIMe1!1 <br />Sidewalks? I <br />SaDitaty ~ <br />CitJ water? <br />Hawllll,d1af__"'llUlBidodlo~_1 <br />What poI1ion outside the developmcmtarea does the ~ pay? <br />Please show on a map where file developers portion lies. <br /> <br />BecauSe development builds on the exjtdi11g commitfti.;y ~ aud adds additioDal cost and burden on it. should it not be <br />required to add value to that base of m~g services to ~ these costs without ili'f'9'li11g on the ~lllfing ,:onua"I..i~ who <br />paid for an adequate system for their usage? <br /> <br />If the developer is requiIecl to i.1IstaIl city water for his:t= and loop it boose of city staDdants, and he. operates for <br />profit aud will recoup his cost from the development, why <mrent IeSi.deots be pena1i7.ed (~UlS-l;nHI) for added va1ue the <br />developer is n.quMd to provide? <br /> <br />Will there be ooJlllJGtitil'C bJddi1\g on work outside the ~ area not part of the developers respoDSibility? <br /> <br />Once improvements have been made, 8SIK~al!ll~. . and property taxes a4ustedfor City~ to msri1d1rin these <br />improvemeDts, should it not be the fidocisry responsibility the City Council to see that such funds are p.roperly maift'Jlined ... <br />to acoo,np1i$h this nmi~? <br /> <br />We ask tIIat tile City Coud1 respoad to tile above itemlin wrlthq; to as (......tist of tf'1.....) aDd tb8t we werk <br />togetIler witI1 statJ amd the developer to resolve tkese I before aDy work is bid and started. <br /> <br />__ .~-'-:.J <br />