Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I .~ <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />Statement <br /> <br />We support development ancl progrilss in our CO....".,mity <br />reascma'b1classInTMf.lftt$ OIl property 0WDeIS for t1lese <br /> <br />we realize tbat pmgnlSS ancl improvemeDt may requiJe <br /> <br />We challenge the current City Council to be proactive ancl <br />mtb.er than reactive and usiDg poor so1utioDs of the past. <br />paying for JDiWttM ' In some cases pi....,. 0WDeIS paid an <br />p1mmi1\g We refer to projects ~ lawsuits have blockecl <br />Then this,burden is passed to all to pay throu&h property <br /> <br /> <br />. in their approach to city improvemeD1S ancl typNH., <br />p1~ ancl timiDaof~~ cmIy resa11s in~one <br />for the service ancl the extra tax burden for poor <br />city from ~ as&DSS"~'" for lack ofw1ue pined. <br />ancl those paying the 8SSCllfment pay both. <br /> <br />WoW thotutilily_iIIIaoI, -"'~bo__._iIIIaoI, -oiIJ-..- <br />mAi~ 8CC01J1lF These IMiUU4t8 should be fi1uatKBI properl,.. dewloper and ~-- utility use fees. use <br />permits, (such as I08Cl use permit fees for access to . sites to cover long term repair for 1I1ISeeD I08Cl "'""9), ancl <br />restoration fees for actual ~ <br /> <br />CoDStruction of new utilities Deeds to be dealt with from ,d~lwlpoiDt ofwho. wm pmfit 01' who lias actual need. This should <br />not burden those tbat may JeCOUP'their cost in 10 to 20 ancl pay additioDal taxes on utility wbJatioDs tbat may be <br />questioDab1e ancl not be essetJtiaJ RecoDstruction should be with as "c:ause for." In other words, why does it need to be <br />recoostruc:tecl Was the work dcme poorly the first time. the iDsta11er should pay. 01' was theIe ~ due to misuse, <br />then the .leSp01ISible pI11y should pay the <lOSl1f . is nee:; ~ ..ry due to lack: of ...,imOOIf1P!,1\mdiDJ from the city <br />~ ~ the JDODCY is ...pposecl to be aUocated from taxes, must cover it. <br /> <br />Once improvemeD1S have been made, assv.~ts ilr\f-osed ~ taxes a4justed for city budgets to mAitdllin these <br />improvemeDtS. it is the ficIucjaJy respoqsibility of the City . to see that such t\mds are .-upedy ..,it.IAillClt to <br />acc,~i,h this msrintenaft(:le. <br /> <br />QaesdoDs OR p+ ~ Additioa <br /> <br />When wm the Water fIIKI ~~ M_A~ ~ be ready? <br />(As passed at the 2J26/2003 council nHWing) <br />Has the scope of this study been eomp1etM? <br />If not, when wiU it be done? <br />When it is done. wiU it be available for public comment? <br />Will this study be used in the ~ for Mill Rd., Pe1timr Lake Dr.. Peltier Cr., aacl Centenri11e Rd.. in relation to the <br />Peltier Preserve Addition? <br />If NO, what wiU be the criteria for proposing ~ to ~ above area? <br />le.: VJSU81 i1Ispection, soil boring, past construction ~ etc. <br />Of the $817.000.00 projected city utilities costs for the ~ Preserve, J)lease outline the details. That is: <br />What are the projecteclline items costs for the project? <br />Streets? <br />Storm sewer? <br />Sidewalks? <br />SanitaIy sewer? <br />City water? <br /> <br />How much of these costs are outside the development area <br />What porIion outside the developmeDt area does the deveI pay? <br /> <br />,l <br />