Laserfiche WebLink
<br />n.. - -. _.. . -...... .....00-...._ ......-.H....- -'-' -- -. .--.. - -....-...... '--~'. "_, .__. ..-._.... ...... _...~....__...._. ..._.H._._......" ...__._ ".. .~...;,......~."'_....~. ...~~.,......,.~..,,---..-,,_..;..\.....\~..".;.~i~.lW.~'f <br /> <br />Centerville City Council <br />Meetin Minutes <br />g . <br />February 26, 2003 <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated the Chief had given the definition of potentially dangerous <br />dog and. this dog meets one or two requiremei:J.ts, so there is no question that the <br />determination of Council will follow the recommendation of the Chief as well as state <br />statute. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated. that the size of the dog does not matter. <br />She then commented that Ms. Wirth has several of the required items already and <br />declaring the dog potentially dangerous and requiring the fenced backyard, kennel, and <br />insurance, as well as, requiring that the dog be under the control of an adult when on <br />leash should not pose an undue hardship on Ms. Wirth. <br /> <br />r^ <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney commented that running away from a dog or not stopping could provoke <br />the dog to attack and that may be why the people stopped when the dog approached them. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Councll Member Broussard Vickers <br />to uDhold the determination of the classification of Dotentially danllerous dOll. All in <br />favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />Chief Heckman indicated that State Statute 347.515 requires a microchip be implanted <br />for identification. <br /> <br />Motion bv Councll Member Broussard Vickers~ seconded bv Councll Member Paar <br />that the Dotentially danllerous dOll have a DrODer enclosure. the owner Drovide and <br />show Droof annually of Dublic liability insurance. when on leash be under the <br />control of someone 16 years of He or older~ and that the owner Drovide Droof of <br />microchiD identification as Drovided by state statute. All in favor. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />VI. PUBUC HEARING(S) <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />VII. BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Resolution #03-011 - Wiseguy's Pizza and Pub Administrative Fine <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney read a letter from the Police Department concerning the failed <br />compliance checks by Wiseguy's Pizza and Sager's Liquor. He then indicated that both <br />businesses would be fined $500. <br /> <br />Motion bv Councll Member CaDrL seconded bv Councll Member Broussard <br />Vickers to aDDrove Resolution #03-011. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Page 6 of20 <br />