Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Optimists, including the U.S. Treasury <br />Department, thought the effect of <br />those changes would be minimal- <br />.. - '. TI:~;~ated an 18 percent drop <br />in rehabilitation ~ctivi~ ~reservation- <br />ists predicted the amount pf invest- <br />ment could fall by as much as half. <br />Unfortunately for both historic build:" <br />. ings and the urban revitalization that <br />their rehabilitation spurred, even that <br />proj~Il'was't06 .t(~sy. In the eight <br />years smce tax reform was adopted, . <br />certified rehabilitation projects have <br />fallen 82 percent and investment in <br />those projeCts is off 80 percent. <br /> <br />Recently, however, there have been <br />indications of reriewed interest in the <br />rehabilitation of historic buildings <br />using the tax credits. This interest <br />sparked the reissuing of A Guitk to <br />. " Tax-AtJoontogeti RBhtz!Ji!itQtion as an <br />lnjormotion booklet. The changes in <br />this update are nominal and deal <br />primarily with amendments to the <br />tax law since 1986. <br /> <br />What Is the &ItoIJilitotiOft <br />Tax Credit.P <br /> <br />~~d~r.~~ _~)a.:w 9ff~1l !. u~que <br />incentive to taxpaye~ who contrib- <br />ute to the preservation of this <br />nation's old and historid buildings. <br />By rehabilitating directly or investing <br />in the rehabilitation of eligible <br />buildings, taxpayers can take advan-' <br />~ 1l two-tier tax credit. <br /> <br />The federal income tax credit is. equal <br />to 20 perCent of the cost of rehabilitat- <br />ing historic buildings or 10 percent of <br />the cost of rehabilitating nonhistoric <br />buildings constructed before 1936. <br />These credits provide a'dollar-for- <br />dollar reduction of income tax owed. <br />While the 20 percent credit is available <br />for rental residential buildings, neither <br />credit is available for homes or apart- <br />ments occupied by their owners. <br /> <br />"'7.::1:1:1 <br /> <br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />In the case of historic buildings, the <br />goal of me rehabilitation credit is not <br />to preserve a building as a museum, <br />but m.p-gJ .it .bac~ ~C? use. ~ ~~et _ <br />current housing, retail, commercial, <br />and ;ndustrial needs. These needs, <br />however, must be met through con- <br />struction that is appropriate to a <br />buildjng's historic character. <br /> <br />. . .. ..,;..-".~ <br /> <br />'e <br /> <br />From1982 through .1993, the historic <br />rehabilitation credit stimulated an <br />estimated. investment of $14.8 billion <br />in nearly 20,500 historic buildings. <br />While large-scale projeCts are often the <br />most visible, in fact the rehabilitation <br />credits have most often been used on <br />smaller projeCts. Since the inception <br />of the first rehabilitation credits, more <br />than'70 percent of historic projects <br />incurred expenditures of less than <br />$500,000, and nearly a third have been <br />projects bfless than $100,000. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />Rehabilitation investment gives old <br />and historic buildings a place in the <br />contemporary real estate market, <br />The goal of this revi~ed publication thereby guaranteeing their continued <br />is to remjnd preservationists and 1.1se and oontribunon.to an area's <br />irivestors that, while diminished from ecortomic vitality. In some cases <br />earlier years, the federal historic rehabilitation involves relatively small <br />rehabilitatlontax credit remains a expenditures to renew a building's <br />v~uable tool for saving historic structural or m~hanical systexns. In The National Park Service, which <br />buildings aild revitalizing towns an<,l odlers, rehabilitation may involve a . administers ~e ~ credit certification <br />. ....ci~~s .~~ut;~er~ca..: .,,~r ~ \.~~~~ ~eoo,ft~tr!J9rlon ~fa.~l;1~~~n~~ : J';fogratn,~aj' obser:ve~ ~t hou~ng.h~ <br />. : :', . . ~. -. : . , ". ,~. . . . .' : . . . ~. mtenor spaces; .' been t4e smgle most Important use for <br />. - rehabilitated historic buildings. More <br />than 125,000 housing units have been <br /> <br /> <br />'11 <br /> <br />. This range in size and type of projects, <br />. and the similar diversity of nonhistoric <br />rehabilitations, such as the renovaoon <br />of comer stores, brownStones, restau- <br />~ts and schools, demonstrates the <br />breadth of opportunity that still exists <br />for participation in this program. <br /> <br />10 qnolifJ for the historic relta/Jilitotion <br />lox credits, reItoIJilitotion work must <br />comply flDitlt the &cretory of the lnterior's <br />Standards for Rehabilitation. Here the <br />Roche Biometfeco! Laborotories undertokes <br />the corefttl restorotion of the focode of the <br />1929 Atlontic Bonk ond TntSI Compony <br />/miMing in Burlington, North Coro/ino. <br />The compony Itos locoted its corporote <br />office complex in Burlington's D()fI))ftt()fl!}fl <br />Notionol lWgister Historic District. <br /> <br />e <br />