Laserfiche WebLink
The Making of a Successful <br />Strategic -Planning Session <br />BY DAVID UNMACHT <br />The first few months of each new year <br />are turning points for our cities. <br />Newly elected officials are entering <br />office, a new budget is in effect, new <br />goals are being pursued, and—despite <br />the depths of winter settling in—there is <br />often a fresh, exciting energy about the <br />year ahead. The new year is also a time to <br />reflect on the recent past and think about <br />what is planned or expected in the next <br />12 months. <br />This is often the time cities do their <br />collective thinking in traditional goal -set- <br />ting or strategic -planning sessions. I <br />have directly participated in or facilitated <br />dozens upon dozens of these sessions <br />in my career. The sessions are a healthy <br />and productive way to, simply put, get <br />the elected officials and staff on the same <br />page. But there is an art to conducting <br />these sessions, and that is the essence of <br />the inherent challenges and the reason <br />some people question their effectiveness. <br />A couple of years ago, at a League <br />of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Annual <br />Conference, Mark Casey, city manager <br />of St. Anthony Village (and current LMC <br />Board member) and I presented a session <br />entitled "Strategic Planning: Simplified <br />for Practical Use in Your City." The City <br />of St. Anthony Village is but one of many <br />great examples of a city with a history of <br />excellence in strategic planning. <br />The title of our presentation manifests <br />my belief perfectly. When considering a <br />session, it is advisable to keep it simple <br />and make sure it is practical. There are <br />countless methods and motivations for <br />conducting goal -setting sessions. There is <br />no one right way. However, based on my <br />experiences, I offer a few tried and true <br />observations to increase your odds for a <br />successful experience. <br />There are typically two seasons for <br />these sessions: mid -year in anticipation <br />of the budget process or at the begin- <br />ning of the new year, when the many <br />planned and anticipated projects need to <br />be prioritized. The timing of a session is <br />a factor of each ciWs culture, tradition, <br />and needs. It is important to note that <br />goal -setting sessions are not necessar- <br />ily the same as team -building sessions. <br />Some of the principal features may <br />overlap, but the content and agenda are <br />distinctively different. <br />It is important to have a clear and <br />defined process with an agreed-upon <br />agenda. It is always best—in advance <br />of the meeting—to seek input from <br />intended participants on their goals and <br />expectations of the session. If partici- <br />pants have varying expectations, that <br />can lead to a very bad experience. It is <br />easy to prevent this outcome with open <br />communication and an understanding of <br />intentions in advance. <br />A clear and defined component of <br />success is an inclusive and participatory <br />discussion. Everyone's voice is equal, and <br />opinions need to be shared, expressed, <br />and encouraged. For strategic planning, <br />key staff need to be involved. In that <br />regard, it is important for the mayor and <br />council to be open to new and differing <br />ideas. A staff member must be designated <br />to take notes or record key points for <br />future reference and use. Because they do <br />not happen on a regular basis, these types <br />of meetings should also be an enjoyable <br />and fun experience. <br />Why at times do they not work well? <br />What gives these sessions a bad rap? After <br />30 years of participating and watching <br />these sessions, I believe there is one <br />significant reason: lack of follow-through <br />or accountability for next steps. That is <br />when the meeting itself becomes an event <br />as opposed to a single step in a larger pro - <br />14 <br />St. Paul to City Hall` <br />cess. To avoid that, the mayor, city council, <br />and administration must designate a point <br />person (usually the city administrator) <br />to ensure that information generated <br />from the work session is brought back for <br />further consideration, discussion, and <br />ultimately, action. This takes time and <br />effort, but is important. <br />There are many other relevant <br />details, including whether or not to use <br />a facilitator, the best location for your <br />meeting, the length of the meeting, and <br />what information is needed in advance <br />for planning and preparation. These are <br />all important considerations, and the <br />answers are unique to each city. <br />If you have questions about how to <br />plan a session or want to learn more <br />about strategic planning, feel free to <br />contact me at the email or phone number <br />listed below. I would be happy to talk <br />with you about it. 00 <br />David Unmacht is executive director of the <br />League of Minnesota Cities. Contact: <br />dunmacht@Imc.org or (651)181-1105. <br />rWW <br />On the web <br />e commentsabout thistopic at <br />w.mncities.org. Click on "St. Paut <br />to City Hall," and post your comments <br />below the story. <br />MINNESOTA CITIES I JAN/FEB 201.7 1 3 <br />