2016-12-14 CC Minutes - (Approved)

Home Browse Search

City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes December 14, 2016 Mayor Wilharber questioned whether funding was available for Consent Agenda Items 45-7 and Administrator Ericson concurred. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member King to Approve Consent Agenda Items #5, #6 and #7 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. Council Member Love thanked both Matt Montain and Russ Koski for their service and stated that he looked forward to working with them as Council Members. Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Paar to Approve Consent Agenda Item #12 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. Council Member King questioned whether surveying of the City owned parcels had been completed previously and whether this is the buyer's responsibility. Administrator Ericson stated that the City's broker has requested that a formal survey be completed to properly market the parcels. Engineer Statz explained that there are several types of surveys such as typographical and land surveys. He also stated that it is general practice that the seller provide the buyer with surveys that are current and the fees generally are contained in the purchase price. Motion by Council Member King, seconded by Council Member Paar to Approve Consent Agenda Item #13 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. P & Z Recommendation for Approval of Application for Lot Split/Rezone — 7384 Old Mill Road Administrator Ericson stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission originally tabled the item as they requested that Staff contacted the property owners and complete additional research regarding the request. Subsequent to speaking with the property owners and additional research it was placed back on the Commission's agenda for consideration. Attorney Glaser stated that the City could approve the request for the lot split along with rezoning from R-5 to R-2 as it fits within the Comprehensive Plan and the property owners cannot develop the property further without platting and addressing the existing roadway issue of exceeding 800'. Attorney Glaser stated that a requirement of the R-2 zoning would complicate the existing driveway on the westerly portion of the property (4 acres) where the current home is. He stated that the City Code reads that all R-2 parcels have a dust free driveway and Ms. Fruth's driveway does not meet those requirements. He suggested that with ongoing issues that the existing homeowner has had and on numerous occasions requested that the repairs be made at the City's expense, Council may desire to complete the asphalting of the entire driveway as the property owner has requested in the past. Lengthy discussion was had regarding proper noticing of the meeting, 60 day rule, the receipt of one application with two (2) requests, the ability of the City to tie the driveway asphalting with Page 6 of 10