My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-22 CC & WS Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2017
>
2017-03-22 CC & WS Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2017 2:13:17 PM
Creation date
3/17/2017 12:51:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCWD Permit Number 16-116 <br />1. Descridon —The project proposes to construct a new building and parking lot on Lot 2 Block 1 of <br />Clearwater Business Park in Centerville, MN. The proposed project area is currently owned by <br />the City of Cen%rvMe. The project will create 2.65± acres of Impervious surfaces and disturb <br />3.401 acres overall. The project discharges south to the JO 3 Main Trunk and ultimately to Lake <br />Peltier the Resource of Concern (ROC). The applicant has submitted a fatal of $3,750 for the <br />application fee, which corresponds to 2.5-5 acres of nowiredeveloped Impervious surface and <br />2.5.10 acres of land disturbance. <br />2. Stormwater — The applicant is proposing the BMPs as described below fur the project <br />• <br />,N1 <br />Impervious Ares <br />1.94 11.88 11.94 10.00 19.09 7.$5 <br />is <br />1 <br />1, <br />�Y. <br />� � .a.'i`,R . - <br />24"." Y,.� r <br />F' <br />�Y �`Y� <br />NURP Pond <br />Olf4ft - South of <br />75,490 <br />8916001 <br />901 <br />Commercial Drive <br />cubic feet <br />Bio -filtration Basin B <br />On4ft — Fast property One <br />NA - Rate Control Only <br />94.3 <br />Blo41ttra8on Basin C <br />On -s ie —West property One <br />NA - Rate Control Only <br />904.3 <br />Solis on site are primarily organic days (HSG D) sobs. Thus, Infiltration Is not considered feasdble <br />and the proposed BMPs are acceptable to meet tine water quality requirement. The BMPa were <br />constructed under permit 05-110 to treat story water runoff from the site, as Indicated in the table <br />below. The City Is both the applicant and owner of the pond. AB -b R records of the atormwafer, <br />pond were submitted for the NURP pond in 2008 verifying that the pond was constructed to plan, <br />however applicant must submit evidence of maintenance or arrange 110 maintain the paced during <br />the construction process. Based on District LIDAR, the bio4ifthion basins were 0 r1GtruCted, <br />however as-bullts must be provided to confirm the size. An moble maintenance obligation <br />must be submitted (see Finding 7 for additional details). <br />During a 2.54nch rainfati event, the stormwater pond requires a dead storage volume of 75.4901 <br />cubic feet The pond provides a total storage volume of 89,6001 cubic feet thus providing <br />suMcient storage. The stormwater pond Inas been designed to NURP standards and has <br />remaining volume for future development Outletcontrol structures from the pond have skimming <br />devices capable of preventing oil and debris for the 1 -year event and controlling the 2-yesA 10 - <br />year, and 100 -year event. The pond has a riprap stabilized EOF at elevation 901 on the west <br />side. The entire site drains to the NURP pond. The bio4 thatlon basins have been designed for <br />rale control only. The applicant has met all the Water Quality requkanments of Rule CA and the <br />design whate of Rule C.9(d). <br />The previously approved calculations used the NURP pond, biofiltration beams and the approved <br />Impervious area listed above to show compliance with District Rule C.7. These BMPs were <br />developed under prior District Rules which used TP 40 precipitation values in modeling. Current <br />District Rules now requires applicants to submit modeling using Atlas 14 precipitation values, <br />The existing regional stormwater BMPs have been constructed fior the overall commercial <br />developrnenL The current project site is only a portion of the drainage area of the overall rate <br />cor" calculations far the development. Modeling of the entire drainage area with Atlas 14 <br />values would be c onsWered an unreasonable burden for the applicant. Analysis oordnrated by the <br />Houston Engineering Inc Page 3 of 4 2/8/2017 <br />21 <br />Impervious Ares <br />1.94 11.88 11.94 10.00 19.09 7.$5 <br />The previously approved calculations used the NURP pond, biofiltration beams and the approved <br />Impervious area listed above to show compliance with District Rule C.7. These BMPs were <br />developed under prior District Rules which used TP 40 precipitation values in modeling. Current <br />District Rules now requires applicants to submit modeling using Atlas 14 precipitation values, <br />The existing regional stormwater BMPs have been constructed fior the overall commercial <br />developrnenL The current project site is only a portion of the drainage area of the overall rate <br />cor" calculations far the development. Modeling of the entire drainage area with Atlas 14 <br />values would be c onsWered an unreasonable burden for the applicant. Analysis oordnrated by the <br />Houston Engineering Inc Page 3 of 4 2/8/2017 <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.