|
�I�gNG
<br /> p �
<br /> ....."",W
<br /> fA
<br /> �
<br /> um � t,'
<br /> �., :1� 90 Min ' pII@'9 'f"i a.Vmum1fee u "r'°1'b0,38
<br /> � y
<br /> 651-429,3232 arffiik�651-429,W9
<br /> IIIIIIIIIIIIIOOu
<br /> •,/,.i- .uIIIIVi�011111111111VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUmllllllllllllllllll
<br /> ,.�.. uu uuuuuumuu uuuuuuuuuuuuumouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
<br /> �1
<br /> IIIIIIIIIIIO IIU II
<br /> /a.i i u i Imumlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
<br /> ,`..,, � ,;.. �l. wmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummomwu�mum�uuuumouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummuuuuupuuumuumomwu�mimuuuuuumip�uuuuuuuu�uuuuuuuuuuumuuuuuuuuuowummuum�mmwu�muuuuuuuuuuu�muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumuumummuuuu�m
<br /> 1
<br /> October 3,2017
<br /> Memo to Planning d 7,oning ODmnfission
<br /> Re: Peltier.Estdes
<br /> REZONING: . . QST. '11m rezoning requests µ -11 ;1 - . . h
<br /> Qmiprehewive Pla.na d t1m1 1 to low density development "...i
<br /> propms ,1 d .,. m1 is less than 2 unitg pax acre.That is wdl within the defined dcmty-fo
<br /> R-2,w m may wish to make X11 the actions aiiii.1 1 , 1 contingent U.F.XMlq, f"
<br /> the othes. being. approved-A :gym . 1i . for approval is aftached.
<br /> If you deterrmne that than request should not be acceptablel rexoff unend t, � .�you tab,1
<br /> the 10 allow findingse for denial.
<br /> SUBDIVISION. " o W is a subdivisiori to allowis ofd h
<br /> townhomes. "Ibesubdivisioxi h , many positive, featmes,1 11 d. °have issue
<br /> Setbacks frora fromthe.right of wad line are Jess than usual for an R-2 Za:a c. R-2 would
<br /> typiedily expect 35 floot sM. the property 1" (right of way). 1'mm the prW,sed
<br /> development, mm1 and rear selbacks , 1. for most lots d a bit more for a 1
<br /> lots.., Side sd,backs are 5 feet,rather than 1 : ' . Wbile mar-yardpk.is 10 fe d. fmm.
<br /> the lot Unna, m1ditional commona id total of about 20 fo,A from, to wedand.
<br /> Adequate distance fhnn.the dwelling to t'1m edd i s a mnce=4since the wedands-will
<br /> dry out and presmt a,fie danger.
<br /> As a townhome development,you might xpect to see lesser sed ,but ,,t
<br /> hese
<br /> minimal. u do have , ability t 11. the.pro r at tb , 1 1 unit
<br /> development. v1;1m X1.1, , t. a , :1. °1m1.11 m . , ,mm der
<br /> t fro t (.,V 1e,d ffmty. Because1i.0s is a rMstanding development
<br /> sett „off „m1, m.mm ,'1am,m �a m:.m m m1cu .. :1confincd
<br /> "
<br /> 1:11 .1 the shvd be public. At the last.P&Z rawtin&the city asked the
<br /> developer to rem1binit his planwith a street that meeLs the City's normal design
<br /> That .mawmald be for a 33 foot Ekwn backbackS Of CUFb,Tathex than 30 feetas in the pmp. sal.
<br /> was also tx)show l impact 1m -thathad on the setbacks ..the-various lots
<br /> that dmwmg today. it apptars ftt the nonud%bect design can-work without significantly
<br /> affecting'building w
<br /> .If the street 1.s public,then the pond should alsobe putflic,since,it would receive
<br /> amnwaler frfAnm 11.1 :1? :e a '[he pond as currently desiped has insufficient acecss
<br /> . ", n e., '11e building I.At '1 dl; be 11m�mm. amorder
<br /> .d
<br /> l
<br /> good to the on :1.� t outlet ,....t form "
<br /> Trail. The trail proposes aboardwalko the wedand.This is a trail desigm that the
<br /> city domnot currently 1mmm " Since it a ... d 1
<br /> 3
<br />
|