2017-10-11 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

and not connect through to any other property,the City may is to consider making that a ®v connection to the city sidewalks/trails,to be maintained by the homeowner's association.Also,trail lighting should be considered. Ile traillboardwalk is proposed to be located over the sanitary sewer. If that is going to be the case, and if the Council determines thiss o of trail,the owners should be responsible to repair or replace the trail at their own expense,should the city need to excavate the sewer. The narrow lot spacing is not ideal on either side of Lot 13 where water and sanitary sewer will be constructed. Easements would need to be granted on the small lots as well as the open space between. Ideally,the easement would not encroach on the small building lots,but rather stay within the common areas. Perhaps Lot 13 should be elumnated to avoid crowding where the utilities are constructed. If one or more to in the l® were eliminated it would also permit adding some additional off-street parking where it is needed most. The number of proposed off-shreet parking spaces seems insufficient,given the large number,and the spacing,of driveways, especially in the cul- de-sac. City Code requires that the Homeowner Association documents be submitted for review by the City.Those have not been received.HOA requirements are in City Code Sec. 156.263. The HOA should receive ownership of any common spaces,including the traillboardwalk development sign,off-street parking spaces, etc. A draft findings and recommendation for approval of the subdivision is attached. Approval should he granted only in conjunction with the PUD. If you deteranne that the request should not be acceptable, I recommend that you table the matter to allow findings to be prepared for denial. PLANNED UN1T DEVELOPMENT.The PUD section of the Code is the means by which a development with difficult site conditions can be considered. In return for lesser setbacks,wetlands am preserved and other concessions may be granted by the developer. All of the setbacks are not meeting the normal requirements for the underlying zoning distria Lot size is about 4,000 square fed,well to the 15,000 square feet called for in the underlying district,but adequate for a townhorne lot. The density is well below the maximum permitted in the underlying district,the wetlands make it very difficult to achieve a reasonable density that can cover the high costs of development City Code that a PUD be processed and approved in the same manner as a requires conditional or interim use permit. Also,a PUD development agreement would be required to assure that all of the cities concerns are taken care of and that the developer provides financial guarantees to assure performance. A draft findings and recommendation for approval of the PUD is attached.If you determine that the request should not be acceptable e,I recommend that you table th matter to allow findings to be prepared for denial. Dallas Larson,Interim Administrator 36