Laserfiche WebLink
Bollard design for trails and fire protection Page 6 of 8 <br /> Apparatus Bumper Impacts Collapsible Bollard <br /> Takedown:5 seconds <br /> Apparatus Bumper Impacts Collapsible Bollard <br /> •Takedown:5 seconds <br /> •Apparatus impacts two-three bollards simultaneously; <br /> •Collapses bollards(sheers retention inserts,replaceable following event) <br /> •Bollards remain in place <br /> If the code-critical average set up time is to be two minutes,then access across-barrier represents a wide range of conservatively-calculated effort <br /> of 5-75 seconds.Bollard design therefore is a relevant variable in a system committed to fire mitigation. <br /> However,as is true of any system,there are contingent time-related factors,which need to be considered by the trail designer,fire protection <br /> engineer,or AHJ. <br /> •Keys can be misplaced during the rush to set up.This is not as I ikely when using the much larger hydrant wrench,which is standard equipment <br /> for first responders.Misplaced keys will be more common when cooperating fire crews arrive from several stations and particularly those from <br /> outside the jurisdiction of the local fire station(see last item in this series). <br /> •Infrequently opened locks can rust or be contaminated with trail or other debris unless they meet the ASTI-standards of NFPA 730—Guide for <br /> Physical Security. <br /> •Inclement weather conditions(snow,rain,sand,debris,mud,or flood)can make funding and unlocking locks a difficult task. <br /> •In the event of a lock failure,for any of the foregoing reasons,the remaining option is the bolt-cutters—usually a two-person task'Under these <br /> circumstances,all bets for efficient access are off. <br /> These contingencies lend themselves to choice of either the hydrant wrench collapsible design or the knock-over design instead of designs using <br /> keys and padlocks.(The knock-over collapsible design is readily repaired on site following the incident.) <br /> In one interview with a seasoned fire fighter from the Northeast with whom we described these design differences,he exclaimed,"'the winter <br /> snows made it almost impossible to find and unlock the bollards.How easy it would have been to just knock them over and drive straight <br /> through!" <br /> Conclusion <br /> Firefighting in the city and even in a small country town can seem almost benign in their relative straightforward response to local fires compared <br /> to situations where two or more fire departments located miles apart from each other cooperatively respond to rural trail fires or wildland urban <br /> interface fires. <br /> As these rather loosely configured"fire-fighting systems"grow in size and diversity,the task of the trail designer,fire prevention engineer,and <br /> authority having code jurisdiction(AHJ)"complexifies."After all,our fire codes do not specify what kind of bollard design—a performance- <br /> design-measure-issue—is required,only that a bollard is necessary!And judging by the hundreds of different local design decisions made by <br /> Al-Us and published on the Internet and accessible from a Google search,the evidence seems clear:a flip of the coin has been sufficient!We have <br /> added a new performance design measure element to assist in simplifying the mix of considerations by the AM.Happy trekking! <br /> Charles G Oakes,PhD,is a security consultant for Blue Ember Technologies,LLC~A detailed discussion of bollard designs is found at <br /> www.Ma3dForceBollards.com. <br /> Print Friendly <br /> ■�7i�iil�l -- <br /> http://www.americantrails.org/resources/trailheadA3dlard-oakes-fire-protection.html 10/18/2017 <br />