My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-06-28 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2006
>
2006-06-28 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2006 12:02:11 PM
Creation date
6/23/2006 3:58:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />_I II II <br />facing the future <br /> <br /> <br />An important goal for 2007 is to outline a strategy for survival of community <br />programming in the North Suburbs if national franchising legislation should <br />become law. There are going to be a lot of things to contemplate. The strategic <br />planning report we receive in 2006 will be helpful in considering steps to be taken <br />to meet our probable funding challenges. A subscriber survey could be helpful in <br />determining which services are more important than others to our viewers. Both <br />will be useful tools for planning for a challenging future. <br /> <br />Staff will work closely with the Operations Committee and Cable Commission to <br />outline possible scenarios for delivering desired servic~s, redefining sources of <br />funding, and if necessary, adjusting staffing levels and structure. <br /> <br />_I II II <br />peg fee <br /> <br /> <br />We are currently at the maximum PEG fee allowed by our Memorandum of <br />Understanding. We are, however, allowed to increase that level annually to <br />cover cost of living increases. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the <br />average CPI for 2005 was 3.4%. Increasing the current PEG fee by this amount <br />results in a nine-cent increase per subscriber, per month, to $2.73. <br /> <br />Considering our current dilemma regarding future funding, I believe it would be <br />prudent to take advantage of our ability to increase our funding by this amount for <br />next year. If a "do no harm" amendment is included in future legislation we will <br />be positioned very well, and can consider whether we want to leave it at that <br />level for the following year. If the amendment is not included, the amount of your <br />PEG fee will be inconsequential. <br /> <br />_I II II <br />conclusion <br /> <br /> <br />We have a good thing going here. Our hope is that we are able to continue to <br />provide the services and programs at the level that our cities, producers, and <br />viewers have come to rely on. We have established some optimistic goals for <br />next year that assume our funding level will not be decreased. At the same time, <br />we will work to be prepared for a less than ideal future. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />t/;J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.