My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-06-28 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2006
>
2006-06-28 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2006 12:02:11 PM
Creation date
6/23/2006 3:58:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Some of the benefits of having a pool of part-time producers include a more <br />reliable and consistently trained crew for van shoots, the ability to produce more <br />programs, a reservoir of individuals who may be interested in also working for <br />cities to tape meetings, and an overall increase in the quality of our final product. <br />The technical quality of our programs is of particular interest to us, as we are <br />working to develop a commercial sponsorship program. We want to be sure our <br />programs look as professional as possible. <br /> <br />While it may seem questionable to suggest increasing our staffing levels at a <br />time when future funding is in jeopardy, it actually makes a lot of sense. Based <br />on first quarter franchise .and PEG fee payments, our traditional income <br />continues to grow. If nothing happens in the legislature, or if a "do no harm" PEG <br />amendment 'is included in the final bill, we will be all the stronger. If, however, <br />our funding is reduced we will have options. We can always nix the part-time <br />pool, or, most of our productions might end up being produced by part-timers. In <br />that case, having a pool of producers established would result in a smoother <br />transition. <br /> <br />_I II II <br />equipment <br /> <br /> <br />We have done an excellent job of gradually upgrading our video production <br />equipment. As it stands, we sbould not require any major purchases for the <br />truck, master control, Studio B, public portable, or the staff portable studio for <br />several years. <br /> <br />The last major area that should be upgraded is Studio A. We recommend <br />purchasing three new camera systems, a clear-com intercom system, one tripod, <br />two DVCPro tape decks, and microphones. <br /> <br />In addition to the Studio, it would be prudent to upgrade editing computers and <br />software, purchase an HD camcorder for highest quality sponsorship spots, and <br />an encoder for master control. (We are currently able to encode two programs at <br />once, but we will soon be faced with three city meetings occurring <br />simultaneously, which will require a third encoder.) We would like to add a wide <br />angle lens and SDI test equipment to the truck inventory, and we should also <br />replace some microphones. Finally, it has become apparent that we could <br />benefit from purchasing a cargo van. (Used would be fine.) It would make <br />transporting the staff portable studio and the van scaffolding much simpler. <br /> <br />We should budget for these expenses, but consider the legislative climate before <br />spending it. <br /> <br />A table of recommended equipment purchases for 2007 is attached to this report. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />S'1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.