Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />January 8, 2020 <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve the <br />Consent Agenda Items 1-3, and 5 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Item #4 - Council Member Koski had concerns regarding the letter of credit reduction. City <br />Administrator Statz stated that it is customary to reduce the letter of credit upon the installation of <br />infrastructure and its acceptance by the City. He stated that staff felt that retaining $50,000 for the <br />final layer of asphalt for the street, repairs of the street near the entrance and within the cul de sac <br />and minor items could be covered by that amount. He reported that the majority of costs that <br />remain are associated with the lakeshore and the winter season is the best time resolve these items. <br /> <br />Item #6 - Council Member Koski asked the differences in the previous agreement comparative to <br />the new agreement. Administrator Statz stated that the Parks & Recreation Committee felt that <br />the Bald Eagle Water Ski Club was a good partner with the City and that no fee other than one (1) <br />dollar should be charged. He stated that items were updated regarding the practice dock and jump <br />along with staying away from manhole on the site. <br /> <br />Item #7 – Council Member Koski was concerned about the costs associated with the upgrades to <br />the existing irrigation system at LaMotte Park and requested clarification. Administrator Statz <br />stated that previously the City received news that we were awarded a grant from the Metropolitan <br />Council for $100,000 with a 25% City match. He stated that if the City expended at least a total <br />of $133,333 the 25% would be $33,333 with the entire amount of $100,000 being granted. He <br />commented that the estimated project amount was $192,000. Council Member Koski had concern <br />regarding the proposed engineering fees associated with the project and Administrator Statz stated <br />that they would be expended from the grant funding. Administrator Statz stated that the City could <br />earn credits if the system is enlarged or the area encompassing the system was enlarged. These <br />credits could be used toward the Downtown Street Project rather than funding raingardens and <br />runoff options required by RCWD. Council Member Koski asked whether the City went out for <br />bids on the project and Administrator Statz stated no as Stantec originally designed the irrigation <br />system and they are familiar with the project. Council Member Koski stated that he would feel <br />more comfortable if bids were obtained in the future. <br /> <br />Council Member Montain stated that he felt that the proposal of $92,000 seemed high for the City’s <br />expenditures associated with the project and he also had concerns regarding liability with placing <br />City equipment on privately owned property to gain credits. Council Member Montain requested <br />additional information on the breakdown of the grant amount and the 25% matching City funds. <br />Administrator Statz stated that he would forward an email to the entire Council. Council Member <br />Montain reminded Council that they are approving the grant agreement ($100,000) and the hiring <br />of Stantec as the engineering provider for the project ($29,400). <br /> <br />Council Member Love questioned whether the City could place equipment on private property. <br />Administrator Statz stated that the equipment that would be placed on the Church property would <br />be more traditional irrigation rather than a gun style. He also stated that an agreement would need <br />to be entered into which would clarify indemnification. City Attorney Glaser stated that an <br />agreement would need to be mutually acceptable and dependent upon the scope of the project <br />relating to private property. Discussion ensued regarding the funding being expended from the <br />Storm Water Funds, Legal and Staff time, utilizing land versus ponding for the downtown <br />Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />