My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-24 CC WS & Meeting Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2020
>
2020-06-24 CC WS & Meeting Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2020 6:03:37 PM
Creation date
6/19/2020 6:02:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Source % of Funding Cost <br />Excess General Fund Balance <br />64% $192,000 <br /> <br />Sewer Utility $33,000 <br />11% <br /> <br />Water Utility $33,000 + $30,000 <br />11% + 10% <br /> <br />Stormwater Utility $12,000 <br />4% <br /> <br />Total $300,000 <br />Depending on how the council chooses to view the General Fund surplus, it may or may <br />not be totally expended on this project. Staff stands ready to help the City Council <br />understand the methodology of these alternatives and the policy implications as you <br />deliberate. <br />Capital Equipment Fund <br />The Capital Equipment Fund has a current balance of roughly $250,000. It is important <br />to remember that this balance sits outside of <br />originally had items such as City Hall HVAC, carpet and other similar items programmed <br />into it. Therefore, it would be very appropriate to take money from that fund to pay for <br />the parts of this renovation project which were specifically enumerated in our former <br />Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs). However, <br />, assuming they would come from general <br />fund excess fund balance. Therefore, if we use the Capital Equipment Fund to help pay <br />for any of the renovation project, we will need to adjust its CIP, and therefore, our annual <br />contribution to it, accordingly. This would be a sensible strategy, if the Council felt that <br />the city hall project pushed us too close to our general fund cash balance minimum. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.