Laserfiche WebLink
44.May Fund payments be provided to non-profits for distribution to individuals in need of financial <br />assistance, such as rent relief? <br />Yes, non-profits may be used to distribute assistance. Regardless of how the assistance is structured, <br />the financial assistance provided would have to be related to COVID-19. <br />45.May recipients use Fund payments to remarket the recipient’s convention facilities and tourism <br />industry? <br />Yes, if the costs of such remarketing satisfy the requirements of the CARES Act. Expenses incurred <br />to publicize the resumption of activities and steps taken to ensure a safe experience may be needed <br />due to the public health emergency. Expenses related to developing a long-term plan to reposition a <br />recipient’s convention and tourism industry and infrastructure would not be incurred due to the public <br />health emergency and therefore may not be covered using payments from the Fund. <br />46.May a State provide assistance to farmers and meat processors to expand capacity, such to cover <br />overtime for USDA meat inspectors? <br />If a State determines that expanding meat processing capacity, including by paying overtime to <br />USDA meat inspectors, is a necessary expense incurred due to the public health emergency, such as if <br />increased capacity is necessary to allow farmers and processors to donate meat to food banks, then <br />such expenses are eligible expenses, provided that the expenses satisfy the other requirements set <br />forth in section 601(d) of the Social Security Act outlined in the Guidance. <br />47.The guidance provides that funding may be used to meet payroll expenses for public safety, public <br />health, health care, human services, and similar employees whose services are substantially <br />dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency. May Fund <br />payments be used to cover such an employee’s entire payroll cost or just the portion of time spent <br />on mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency? <br />As a matter of administrative convenience, the entire payroll cost of an employee whose time is <br />substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency is <br />eligible, provided that such payroll costs are incurred by December 30, 2020. An employer may also <br />track time spent by employees related to COVID-19 and apply Fund payments on that basis but <br />would need to do so consistently within the relevant agency or department. <br />48.May Fund payments be used to cover increased administrative leave costs of public employees who <br />could not telework in the event of a stay at home order or a case of COVID-19 in the workplace? <br />The statute requires that payments be used only to cover costs that were not accounted for in the <br />budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020.As stated in the Guidance, a cost meets this <br />requirement if either (a)the cost cannot lawfully be funded using a line item, allotment, or allocation <br />within that budget or (b) the cost is for a substantially different use from any expected use of funds in <br />such a line item, allotment, or allocation.If the cost of an employee was allocated to administrative <br />leave to a greater extent than was expected, the cost of such administrative leave may be covered <br />using payments from the Fund. <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />