2020-11-19 EDA Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Alternative Construction The data center economics were modeled after more common design methods. However, newer construction methods are being used to drive down the cost of these expensive facilities. One of the largest opportunities for savings leverages the use of external containers to house MEP equipment. Even if the code does not currently allow for MEP construction, the City is open to the idea of alternate construction methods. As not all equipment is ideal for this type of environment, the equipment most commonly suited for containers are: Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) and batteries Main Distribution Panels (MDP) Automatic Transfer Switches (ATS) HVAC cooling systems Systems typically not targeted for a container include generators. Most of the generators come in a sound-attenuated enclosure similar to or larger than the typical container. Pros for Modular MEP Construction The standardized construction typically reduces the construction cost of the facility by 10% for the following reasons: The work is all completed in a factory, avoiding weather delays. The standardized construction eliminates the human error associated with onsite construction. The large factories typically get better pricing on components and raw materials than a regional construction firm. Cons for Modular MEP Construction The following is a list of concerns that would need to be addressed with all parties and code officials: Reduces the footprint of the build, as much of the MEP infrastructure is now located outside the building. Aesthetically, additional costs may be required to secure and hide the containers from surrounding properties. 2020 MTC DCLM DC Model (1) Page 14 of 20 2020 Excipio Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. This document is proprietary and confidential and may not be duplicated, redistributed, or displayed to any other party without the expressed written permission of Excipio Consulting LLC.