My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-02-10 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2021
>
2021-02-10 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 6:51:25 PM
Creation date
2/10/2021 6:50:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />September 9, 2020 <br /> <br />decrease the residential individual property share. He stated that the County generally forwards <br />information regarding what the tax increase will would be but he believed it would be less than a <br />¾% increase for residential property. Mayor Love stated that would it be fair that with the <br />increased tax base, taxes could go do or remain flat. Finance Director DeJong concurred. <br />Council Member Montain thanked the EDA for their proposed budget. He stated that the labor <br />agreement could modify the levy. He felt that the Fire District budget was great. Council Member <br />Wilharber felt that staff did a great job of putting this information together and that items looked <br />good. Council Member Lakso concurred with Council Member Montain and Wilharber on the <br />above stated items. She reported that the Centennial Fire District budget was completed with the <br />intention that the outcome of the study was unknown and that there may be an impact to the budget. <br />She stated that she would not be proud of the budget and would not expect coming back to request <br />additional funding. She felt that nothing should be done in the middle of the year and some <br />individuals on the Fire Steering Committee have stated that will be the case if needed. <br />Administrator Statz stated that this needs to be discussed and if individuals feel that leaving a <br />$10,000 contingency would be allowable if desired. He also stated that with a zero percent increase <br />the department can operate very robustly. He said that he felt changes should not be made mid- <br />year also. Council Member Koski stated that he asked about planning for a contingency as public <br />safety is very important and would not want to act on what is recommended without funding. He <br />stated that he is cautious with revenue especially with COVID. He stated that he desired to discuss <br />with Finance Director DeJong why taxes appear to still be going up when revenue and new taxing <br />avenues have become available such as new homes and businesses. He also thanked the EDA for <br />their budget. Finance Director DeJong stated there is lag time from construction to showing on <br />taxes for distribution of a levy value. He stated that it is not recognized until January 2 of the <br />following year and that the tax value goes on one (1) more year following that year (2 year process). <br />s tax value will show on 2021 but <br />show in 2022. He stated that this is the same for residential housing units. <br />Mayor Love asked whether allocation of some CARES funding to EDA would have an impact on <br />ed leaving the Proposed Preliminary Budget alone <br />and exclude CARES funding. He stated that the reporting is very evolving and budget as if do not <br />have it and treat the funding as a bonus. He felt the money that is offset by those funds should be <br />saved for purchases in the future. He stated that <br />unforeseen. Mayor Love stated that funding for parking lot lighting has been discussed in depth <br />and asked whether funding would be coming from the Street Fund and budgeted. Administrator <br />Statz stated that he desired for that funding to come from the Capital Fund but it is not budgeted <br />for. He stated that it may mean bumping another item and Council could do that with the <br />contingency of the $50,000. Administrator Statz stated that the Capital contingency could cease <br />and there would be a decrease in taxes. He reported that salaries and cost of living adjustments <br />are also another area that increases largely from year to year. He stated that the funding for the <br />parking lot lighting could come out of the City Hall Renovation Project which would be spending <br />cash down low and remove debt and it comes at the cost of being cash poor. He stated that Council <br />has chosen to be cash poor for a while and get debt off of the books, but also have a <br />cushion/contingency. <br />Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.