My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-03-24 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2021
>
2021-03-24 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2021 6:17:37 AM
Creation date
3/22/2021 6:16:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />December 9, 2020 <br />He also stated that review by all Council Members would ensure something is not being <br />mischaracterized or things being missed. He also stated that his review is to be completed by the <br />entire Council and the Mayor echoes these same thoughts. He stated that the Mayor could be the <br />primary conduit to receive input and that the rest of Council does not feel like he is not receiving <br />undue influence. Mayor Love stated that the review will go through the Personnel Committee and <br />then on to Administrator Statz. He stated that any Council Member can provide feedback. <br />Attorney Glaser advised Council that these comments should be forwarded to him so that there are <br />no Open Meeting Law violations. <br />Council Member Montain provided no comments. Council Member Koski asked if this change <br />the Section 31.03b change City Code or is this policy. City Attorney stated requesting permission <br />and not a Code change. Council Member Lakso asked the process for stopping the process, would <br />it be by request to be sensitive to Council being amicable or not. How dial back. City Attorney <br />stated that Council could place a time limit on it now or propose conditions this evening. Council <br />Member Lakso stated that it would not cross anompted every year on <br />the Agenda. The Personnel Committee exists and would feel better to revisit annually as a Council <br />as members could change, the tone of Council could change, it could become a burden to complete <br />on a monthly basis and that would be unfair/not honoring <br />stated that Personnel Committee/Council will complete a year-end review and at that time <br />discussion whether the process should continue or be modified. Administrator Statz stated that it <br />seemed appropriate that it happen with his Annual Review and the review of the process also. <br />Council Member Wilharber stated a good idea as a policy change. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Montain to Approve <br />the Personnel Board Creating & Giving the City Administrator a Monthly Performance <br />Review. <br />Mr. Steve King, 1724 Sorel Street, asked how this procedure would be implemented. Attorney <br />Glaser stated that the Mayor has been completing similarly to private industry and applying it here. <br />He also stated that the system in place had been that the Administrator had been reviewed annually <br />and the Committee had not been giving these to him. The Committee felt that due to timeliness it <br />would be important to give to him on a monthly basis. He stated that permission has not been <br />granted by Council so the Administrator has not been receiving. Council Member King suggested <br />quarterly. City Administrator Statz stated that he and the Mayor would like to continue the <br />monthly review. He stated that the remainder of Council can add to it or review it for <br />appropriateness. He also stated that if Mayor Love was no longer Mayor and that individual was <br />not as passionate the process would need to be flexible or modified. Mayor Love asked if City <br />Administrator Statz would be sharing the review with the rest of Council or how it would be <br />handled. Attorney Glaser stated that as it is confidential to the employee and no serial Open <br />Meeting Law violations and that he was the best person to deliver and obtain information for the <br />process. <br /> <br />A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and Council Members Koski, Lakso, Montain, & <br />Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried. <br />2. <br />Page 10 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.