My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-04-07 P & R Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2021
>
2021-04-07 P & R Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2021 4:07:32 PM
Creation date
4/1/2021 6:38:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />April 6, 2021 <br />Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />RE: Rehbein Commercial - Preliminary Plat <br />There are three potential scenarios, illustrated to the right: <br />• Street A Not Extended - Access to <br />Lot I/IA via cul-de-sac only <br />• Street A Not Extended - Driveway <br />access only at 20t" Avenue <br />• Street A Extended <br />If Lot 1 /1 A develops with only cul-de-sac <br />access then all traffic serving the lots on <br />Street A would come from 21 It Avenue, <br />except traffic coming from Kwik Trip's right- <br />in/right-out off Main Street (Lot 1/IA is not <br />allowed its own R/R access onto Main <br />Street). This scenario would push traffic onto <br />21 It Avenue and its signal at Main Street, but <br />we don't know the level of those impacts. If <br />Lot 1 /1 A develops with a driveway only at <br />20t", there still might be impacts to 21 It <br />Avenue and the signals. If Street A is <br />extended with full movement at 20t" <br />Avenue, there might be a different set of <br />conditions, with a bypass lane and turn lanes <br />on 20t" Avenue. <br />We suggest a traffic study is needed to <br />quantify these impacts. The study would <br />analyze the impacts to area roadways and <br />traffic signals, comparing traffic conditions <br />with full development of the Rehbein plat, in <br />each of these three scenarios. If the impacts <br />of not building Street A are significant, the <br />City might require the street to be extended <br />and the County's required improvements be <br />made when development is approved for <br />Lot 1 /1 A. If the impacts are negligible, the <br />City could allow Lot 1 /1 A to develop with <br />access only to the cul-de-sac or with R/R <br />only. Regardless of If and when Street A is <br />extended in the future, we suggest that <br />street, sidewalk and trail ROW be dedicated <br />now with this plat. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.