My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-07-28 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2021
>
2021-07-28 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2021 10:17:02 AM
Creation date
7/26/2021 10:16:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />April 14, 2021 <br />have the opportunity to complete some of the tasks, he will take them on. He stated that Stantec <br />will bill hourly, so if there are things he can do, it will bring the cost down a bit. <br />Council Member Mosher stated that he also had questions on #5 and whether it would be worth <br />the possible money savings. He asked if that would be something that Public Works Director <br />Palzer could take on. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz explained that the plan would be that those tasks would be handled between <br />himself and Public Works Director Palzer. <br /> <br />Council Member Mosher asked if Stantec would provide numbers of what their findings are as <br />well as the various measurements. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz explained that he believes the message the PCA is sending to the cities is <br />letting them know that in the past they were being a bit sloppy so the PCA went through and took <br />every line of the 6-page permit application and turned it into a question. He stated that one of the <br />things he thinks has changed are questions regarding having a written process for things rather <br />than just letting the cities answer the question with <br />will end up with is kind of a map from Stantec of how the City can get to where the PCA wants it <br />to be. <br /> <br />Mayor Love asked if Administrator Statz had heard from his peers that this snuck up on them as <br />well. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that the City is not the only party that is scrambling and noted that just <br />today RCWD sent out an e-mail that they were still looking for information from many cities to <br />they can submit by the deadline as well. He stated that he suspects there is a route to extend the <br />deadline, but noted that he does not want to go down that route. <br /> <br />Mayor Love asked about the health of the Stormwater Fund that the payment for this service will <br />be made from. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that it is not very robust. <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong noted that he had asked Stantec for some other breakdowns, but has not <br />gotten those numbers yet. He stated that he has been going through the bills on the downtown <br />project to make sure everything has been accurately applied. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that unfortunately, the City does not have much of a choice in this matter <br />and is appropriate for the payment to come out of the Stormwater Fund. He stated that they are <br />planning to look at this fund at the next Council meeting, so an adjustment could be made if <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong noted that he and Administrator Statz have also spoken about the <br />likelihood of being able to use some of the American Recovery Act funds for stormwater purposes <br />which they feel is a distinct possibility. <br /> <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.