My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-08-10 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2025
>
2021
>
2021-08-10 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2021 3:45:51 PM
Creation date
8/6/2021 3:45:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />VII. Remedies <br />Lorshbough v. Township of <br />Cities have choices in how they will remedy nuisance conditions and <br />Buzzle, 258 N.W.2d 96 <br />enforce their nuisance ordinances. Adopting an ordinance may create a <br />(Minn. 1977). Pelican Lake <br />Property Owners Ass’n v. <br />duty to take some reasonable steps to enforce it on behalf of the general <br />County of Crow Wing, Nos. <br />public. Most cities will use a combination ofmethods, depending upon <br />C5-98-1549, C3-98-1940 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 17, <br />their resources and the seriousness of the offense. Whatever methods are <br />1999) (unpublished <br />used, it is a good practice to have a policy guiding when a particular <br />decision). Schultz v. Frank, <br />No. C1-00-285 (Minn. Ct. <br />method will be used. This will ensure that similar violations are treated <br />App. Aug 1, 2000) <br />equally. <br />(unpublished decision). <br />A.Self-remedy <br /> <br />The most cost-effective way to remedy nuisance conditions is for the <br />individual to correct the situation him- or herself with minimal city <br />involvement. There are situations where someone is unaware that he or she <br />is maintaining a nuisance and will correct the situation when so informed <br />through a letter or a conversation. <br /> <br />Cities can also consider other potentially effective voluntary approaches <br />for nuisance elimination. For example, many cities sponsor neighborhood <br />cleanup days or city-wide recycling events. These activities: provide <br />individuals the opportunity to dispose of many larger items; provide an <br />opportunity for neighborhood residents to work together to address general <br />maintenance issues; and may provide incentive for individuals to fix up <br />their own property. <br /> <br />B. Criminal prosecutions <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.231. <br />Most nuisance ordinances provide that violations will constitute a <br /> <br />misdemeanor offense. A misdemeanor is a crime for which a sentence of <br /> <br />Minn. Stat. § 609.02. <br />not more than 90 days imprisonment or a fine of not more than $1,000 (or <br />both) may be imposed. <br /> <br />Criminal prosecutions may take longer than other alternatives and require <br />a higher burden of proof (beyond a reasonable doubt). However, a possible <br />criminal conviction can provide a good incentive for the individual to <br />bring his or her property into compliance. <br /> <br />As part of the criminal sentencing, some or all of the actual jail time or <br />fines may be suspended (or stayed), so long as the nuisance condition is <br />remedied within a particular period of time. <br /> <br />C. Civil actions <br /> <br />When the city has reasonable grounds to believe a nuisance exists, it may <br /> <br />bring a civil action in district court to end that activity. <br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/16/2020 <br />Public Nuisances Page 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.