Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />See Part VII – F – <br />Rather than seek criminal penalties, cities often pursue a civil remedy to <br />Abatement. <br />achievecompliance with a city ordinance. Civil actions are generally <br />faster, preferred by the courts, and provide the city the advantage of a <br />lower burden of proof (preponderance of the evidence). Civil remedies can <br />include injunctions or restraining orders. Subsequent violations of <br />restraining orders can be enforced though contempt proceedings. <br /> <br />D. Administrative enforcement <br />Hannan v. City of <br />Some cities have adopted administrative enforcement ordinances for <br />Minneapolis, 623 N.W.2d <br />dealing with nuisance conditions. An administrative process is a quasi, <br />281 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). <br />City of Ramsey v. Kiefer, No. <br />non-judicial alternative remedy. Under this system, property owners (or <br />A08-1714 (Minn. Ct. App. <br />other types of alleged nuisance violators) are provided the opportunity to <br />Aug. 25, 2009) (unpublished <br />decision). <br />present their side before an administrative hearing officer (or panel) <br />appointed by the city council. When violations are found, penalties <br />typically follow a pre-established schedule: more nominal fees for a first <br />violation with increased penalties for subsequent acts. <br /> <br />The advantage to establishing an administrative hearing procedure is that it <br />is less formal, less costly, and potentially less intimidating than the court <br />system. The accused is given a chance to come into compliance, with all <br />monies collected retained by the city, not distributed through the state <br />court system. <br /> <br />Cities should be aware that both the state auditor and the state attorney <br />general have questioned whether cities have authority to enact these local <br />processes. Accordingly, cities contemplating such an ordinance should <br />work closely with their city attorney. <br /> <br />E. Licensing <br /> <br />Cities also address nuisance conditions through common regulatory <br />Handbook, City Licensing. <br />means, such as city licenses, permits, and other forms of required <br />Handbook, City Regulatory <br />Functions. <br />registration. The use of licenses and permits offer cities an effective means <br /> <br />to monitor compliance. The conditions included with the application <br /> <br /> <br />process help ensure that an applicant complies with ordinance <br /> <br />requirements before the license or permit is issued. If it is found at a later <br />Minn. Stat. § 415.17. <br />time that the license or permit holder is not in compliance, the city can <br />suspend, revoke, or deny renewal of the license or permit, and potentially <br />even close a business unless or until it is brought back into compliance. <br /> <br />Licensing practices can provide broad benefits to local communities by <br />addressing direct and secondary impacts of particular activities. For <br />instance, cities often regulate: <br /> <br /> The consumption and sale of alcohol. <br /> The conduct of adult businesses. <br /> The conduct of lawful gambling. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/16/2020 <br />Public Nuisances Page 16 <br /> <br />