My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-08-10 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2025
>
2021
>
2021-08-10 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2021 3:45:51 PM
Creation date
8/6/2021 3:45:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 617.86. <br />hearing, may issue a permanent injunction and order of abatement if it <br />finds (by clear and convincing evidence) that a nuisance exists. Violation <br />of temporary or permanent injunction is treated as contempt of court. <br />See Public Nuisances, LMC <br />When adopting a nuisance ordinance, it is important to include a provision <br />Model Ordinance. <br />providing that the city will seek a court injunction when no other adequate <br />remedy exists. <br />3. Orders of abatement <br /> <br />For some nuisance conditions, an order preventing the condition from <br />continuing will sufficiently end the problem conduct. Noise nuisances are <br />a good example; when the noise is no longer allowed, the nuisance no <br />longer exists. In others circumstances (such as the long grass and weeds), <br />the nuisance will continue until steps are taken to eliminate the condition <br />(the grass and weeds are cut). In those cases, an abatement order will <br />provide the process for nuisance elimination. <br /> <br />a. Judicial Orders <br />Ames v. Cannon River Mfg. <br />When a city seeks relief through the courts, the judge’s order will provide <br />Co., 27 Minn. 245, 6 N.W. <br />the process for abatement. It may provide the owner the opportunity to <br />787 (Minn. 1880). <br />remedy the situation himself, as well as provide deadlines for when the <br />city may remove the situation itself. The court is available to resolve any <br />additional disputes that may arise during the process or impose additional <br />penalties for not complying with the order. <br />Minn. Stat. § 617.82. <br />The property owner may enter into an agreement with the city to avoid the <br />City of West St. Paul v. <br />issuance or enforcement of an abatement order. If the property owner fails <br />Krengel, 768 N.W.2d 352 <br />(Minn. 2009). <br />to abate the public nuisance conditions, the city may again seek an <br />injunction. <br /> <br />b. City orders <br />Many cities attempt to avoid the judicial process by including within their <br /> <br />local ordinances the authority to abate nuisance conditions themselves. <br />Mindful of property rights and the need to provide adequate due process, <br />the city ordinance typically provides for: <br /> <br /> Property inspections (which may require obtaining the necessary <br />warrants) and documentation of any nuisance condition or activity. <br /> Written notice of the finding of a violation of city ordinance provided <br />to the owners or operators. <br /> An opportunity to contest the nuisance finding with the city council or <br />selected neutral party. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/16/2020 <br />Public Nuisances Page 18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.