Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />The operations of peddlers, solicitors, and transient merchants. <br />The use of city streets and sidewalks. <br /> Land use and development. <br />See LMC information memo, <br />A land use tool known as a conditional use permit (CUP) is a good <br />Zoning Guide for Cities. <br />example of such a regulation. Conditional uses seek to strike a middle <br /> <br />Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 <br />ground between the unchecked approval of a particular use and complete <br />Minn. 192, 167 N.W.2d 45 <br />prohibition. Conditional uses are uses that will be allowed if certain <br />(Minn. 1969). <br />conditions (that minimize the problematic or nuisance features of the use) <br />are met. If such conditions are not followed, the permit may be revoked. <br />City of Duluth v. Krupp,46 <br />An additional benefit with licensing or permitting systems is the collection <br />Minn. 435, 49 N.W. 235 <br />of a fee. A proper license fee can include the law enforcement/city staff <br />(Minn. 1891). Orr v. City of <br />Rochester, 193 Minn. 371, <br />costs required to properly enforce the city regulations or address the other <br />258 N.W. 569 (Minn. 1935). <br />negative consequences that are likely to occur with that type of activity. <br /> <br />Cities cannot set license fees so high as to prohibit such businesses (or <br />activities) within the city altogether. <br /> <br />F. Abatement <br /> <br />Regardless of what level of priority is placed on regulating nuisance <br />activities, situations will arise that demand city action. Who will act and <br />how the situation is actually remedied depends upon the particulars <br />involved. <br /> <br />1. Voluntary abatement—notice <br />See Part VII – A – Self- <br />In almost all cases, the city’s first step in an abatement process is the <br />remedy. <br />request for a voluntary remedy of the nuisance condition. Again, <br /> <br />convincing an individual to take care of his or her own problems is the <br />most cost-effective way to address most public nuisances. If this does not <br />occur, a clearly written notice is an important first step in providing due <br />process, ensuring that the individual’s property rights are protected if the <br />city must abate the condition itself. <br /> <br />2. Injunctions <br />State v. Sportsmen’s County <br />Since the criminal process can often times be slow and the results are <br />Club 214 Minn. 151, 7 <br />uncertain, it may be necessary to seek injunctive relief to terminate or <br />N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1943). <br />prevent a nuisance. Under its duty and authority to protect the rights of all <br />of its citizens, a city can obtain injunctions to restrain public nuisances. <br />Minn. Stat. §§ 617.82-.83. <br />The city attorney files a petition with the district court seeking a temporary <br />See “Minnesota’s Public and <br />injunction. The court will hold a “show cause” hearing to provide the <br />Private Nuisance Laws,” <br />Minnesota House Research <br />alleged violator an opportunity to be heard on the allegations within the <br />(July 2015). <br />petition. If the judge believes that the condition has occurred, he or she <br /> <br />See Part VII – F – 3 – Orders <br />will issue a temporary injunction, detailing the prohibited conduct or <br />of abatement. <br />conditions. After a temporary injunction is issued, the court, after a further <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/16/2020 <br />Public Nuisances Page 17 <br /> <br />