My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-05-03 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2025
>
2022
>
2022-05-03 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2022 7:43:17 AM
Creation date
5/2/2022 7:27:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Project Banjo Traffic Study — Regional Analysis Addendum April 22, 2022 <br />Page 3 <br />• 21"Avenue — a local roadway that varies between a 2-lane undivided facility from Main <br />Street to Commerce Drive and a 3-lane facility with a shared two-way left -turn lane south of <br />Commerce Drive. The facility terminates approximately 900 feet south of Fairview Street. <br />No multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. <br />• Commerce Drive — a 3-lane local roadway with a shared two-way left -turn lane. No <br />multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. <br />• Fairview Street — a two-lane undivided local roadway which currently terminates about <br />800 feet east of 201" Avenue. This roadway is expected to be extended to 21St Avenue in <br />2022. No multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. <br />• Cedar Street —a two-lane undivided local roadway which primarily serves residential land <br />uses. No multimodal facilities are present. The posted speed limit is 30-mph. <br />From a traffic control perspective, intersections along Main Street at 20t" Avenue, 21st Avenue, and <br />the 1-35E West and East Ramps are signalized. All other study intersections are unsignalized with <br />side -street stop control. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and traffic volumes in the study area are <br />shown in Figure 2. <br />Intersection Capacity <br />Intersection capacity was evaluated using Synchro/SimTraffic Software (version 11), which <br />incorporates methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. The software is used to <br />develop calibrated models that simulate observed traffic operations and identify key metrics such as <br />intersection Level of Service (LOS) and queues. These models incorporate collected traffic, <br />pedestrian, and bicyclist volumes, traffic controls, and driver behavior factors. <br />Level of Service (LOS) quantifies how an intersection is operating. Intersections are graded from <br />LOS A through LOS F, which corresponds to the average delay per vehicle values shown in Table 1. <br />An overall intersection LOS A though LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities. <br />LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand <br />exceeds capacity. <br />Table 1 Level of Service Thresholds <br />Average Delay / Vehicles <br />Level of <br />Service <br />Stop, Yield, and Roundabout <br />Intersections <br />Signalized <br />Intersections <br />A <br />< 10 seconds <br />< 10 seconds <br />B <br />10 to 15 seconds <br />10 to 20 seconds <br />C <br />15 to 25 seconds <br />20 to 35 seconds <br />D <br />25 to 35 seconds <br />35 to 55 seconds <br />E <br />35 to 50 seconds <br />55 to 80 seconds <br />F <br />> 50 seconds <br />> 80 seconds <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.